Tag: Coordination

  • Discuss the Compare of Coordination and Cooperation

    Discuss the Compare of Coordination and Cooperation

    Before Discuss the Compare of Co-Ordination and Co-Operation, first looking at their definition of Coordination and Cooperation. Coordination refers to the organization of all the activities in an orderly manner, to achieve unanimity of individual efforts in the pursuit of group goals. On the flip side, cooperation is a discretionary action of individuals to work together or help one another, for a mutual benefit. It is a joint effort of the members working in the organization for accomplishing a defined target. Also Learned, Essay on the Co-ordination of an Organization, Discuss the Compare of Coordination and Cooperation.

    Here are Learn, Discuss the Compare of Coordination and Cooperation.

    Definition of Coordination:

    By coordination, we mean a cycle, utilized by the administration to synchronize different exercises in the association. The power connects the wide range of various capacities performed by the administration, for example arranging, coordinating, putting together, controlling, staffing, driving, and so forth association, to make the most ideal utilization of the association’s assets.

    Coordination assumes a critical function in keeping up routineness in tasks, for example, buy, creation, deals, human asset, showcasing, account, and so forward, as it is the consistent idea that associates all the exercises. It is something, which is natural in all administrative capacities. The cycle focuses on the efficient administration of individual or collective endeavors to guarantee unanimity in real life, in the achievement of normal destinations.

    Definition of Cooperation:

    We characterize cooperation as an optional action in which at least two people consolidate and work in the quest for shared objectives. In this cycle, the individuals from the association put forth joined attempts, for inferring common advantages. Along these lines, each member is required to effectively partake in the gathering movement, really at that time they can be in an ideal situation.

    Cooperation is available in all the degrees of the association and happens between the individuals from the association. Aside from business, cooperation likewise happens at the public and worldwide level, for example between various states and nations of the world.

    Through cooperation, the data can share among members effectively, which builds the information base, work performed, and assets, in a skilled way.

    Differences between Coordination and Cooperation:

    Basis Coordination Cooperation
    Meaning It is an orderly arrangement of group efforts in pursuit of common goals. It means mutual help willingly.
    Scope It is broader than co-operation which includes as well because it harmonizes the group efforts. It is termed as a part of coordination.
    Process The function of coordination is performed by top management. The functions of co-operation are prepared by persons at any level.
    Requirements Co-ordination is required by employees and departments at work irrespective of their work. Co-operation is emotional in nature because it depends on the willingness of people to work together.
    Relationship It establishes formal and informal relationships. It establishes an informal relationship.
    Freedom It is planned and entrusted by the central authority & it is essential. It depends upon the sweet will of the individuals and therefore it is not necessary.
    Support It seeks wholehearted support from various people working at various levels. Co-operation without co-ordination is fruitless & therefore it may lead to unbalanced developments.

    Therefore, the existence of co-operation may prove to be an effective condition or requisite for co-ordination. But it does not mean that co-ordination originates automatically from the voluntary efforts of the group of members. It has to be achieved through conscious & deliberate efforts of managers, therefore to conclude we can say that co-operation without co-ordination has no fruit and co-ordination without co-operation has no root.

    Discuss the Compare of Coordination and Cooperation Image
    Discuss the Compare of Coordination and Cooperation; Image from Pixabay.

    The Main Key Differences Between Coordination and Cooperation:

    The following points are noteworthy so far as the difference between coordination and cooperation is concerned:

    • The methodical game plan and synchronization of various components of the executives to guarantee, smooth working, know as coordination. The demonstration of working together or following standards, for the acknowledgment of shared objectives, calls cooperation.
    • Coordination is a basic action of the board; that helps in accomplishing agreement in real life among different related exercises and branches of the association. Actually, cooperation relies upon the desire of any individual, for example, to work with or help somebody willfully, for achieving regular destinations.
    • Coordination of a devise cycle performed to incorporate various exercises of the association. Then again, cooperation is a characteristic cycle, which isn’t arranged however happens precipitously, out of shared regard.
    • Coordination is a persistent capacity of the board. Thus, it is as long as possible. As against this, the cooperation of people is needed for achieving an errand or movement, consequently, it is for the momentary as it were.
    • Coordination may bring about the foundation of formal and casual connections. Dissimilar to, cooperation offers to ascend to the casual connection between people.
    • In coordination, there is open correspondence between all the individuals from the association. As restricted, implicit correspondence happens between people in cooperation.
    • Coordination of exercises performs at high-level administration, though cooperation performs at each level.

    Relationship Between Coordination and Cooperation:

    Co-ordination is a systematic plan of collective endeavors to give solidarity of activity in the quest for common destinations. It implies uniting the endeavors of various components of the association to give them the solidarity of direction. While cooperation indicates the collective endeavors of individuals working in the association intentionally to accomplish a specific reason.

    The presence of co-operation among the individuals from a gathering encourages co-ordina­tion. In any case, coordination doesn’t start from the deliberate endeavors of the gathering individuals. It must accomplish by the conscious endeavors of the administration.

    For example, five people occupied with pushing a taxi out of the mud have a solid demeanor of co-operation. Be that as it may, they may not be effective except if one of them gives leader­ship and coordinates the exercises of all. Similarly, the ensemble conductor coordinates the endeavors of the individuals from his gathering to delivering fine music.

    So, co-operation without co-ordination has no organic product, and coordination without co-operation has no root. Co-operation and co-ordination go hand in hand and one is the venturing stone of the other. A decent chief attempts to accomplish both because just through cooperation and coordination he can complete things through others.

  • Explain essay on the Co-Ordination of an Organization!

    Learn, Explain essay on the Co-Ordination of an Organization!

    Before start studying, you must know what common question types asked around the place. Essay for Articles: What is the Essay on the Meaning of Co-Ordination? What is the Essay on the definition of Co-Ordination? What is the Essay on the Need for Co-Ordination? What is the Essay on the Techniques of Co-Ordination? What is the Essay on the Nature of Co-Ordination? and What is the Essay on the Importance of Co-Ordination? Also Learned, Explain essay on the Direction of an Organization! That is similar to Explain essay on the Co-Ordination of an Organization!

    Now Explain it:

    #The Essay on the Meaning of Co-Ordination:

    Co-ordination is the process of synchronization and harmonization of the different activities within the enterprise with reference to time, the progress of work, performance standards, etc. If the objectives of the business are to be realized with a minimum of friction and a maximum of cooperation, a system of coordination through the establishment of the formal relationship among different individuals and departments has to be instituted.

    #The Essay on the Definition of Co-Ordination:

    Henri Fayol, Louis A. Allen, and Ordway Tead considered coordination as a separate managerial function. James D. Mooney considered coordination as the first principle of organization. According to Mooney and Railey, “Co-ordination is the achievement of orderly group effort and unity of action in the pursuit of a common purpose.”

    It is that process whereby an executive develops an orderly pattern of the group effort among his subordinates and secures unity of action in the pursuit of common purpose. “It is the orderly synchronization of efforts to provide the proper amount, timing and quality of execution resulting in harmonious and unified actions towards a stated objective.”

    George R. Terry and Theo Haimann regard coordination as a permeating function of management passing through the managerial functions of planning, organizing, staffing, directing and controlling.

    #The Essay on the Need for Co-Ordination:

    It is a pervasive function. The managers seek to achieve co-ordination through planning, organizing, staffing, commanding and controlling. Performance of any of these functions is an exercise towards coordination. When all these functions are related to each other harmoniously into a unified whole, co-ordination is achieved.

    In fact, managers at all levels, preside over the “nerve centers” of co-ordination in respect of their own spans of control. This means that coordination is the function of all levels of management and not merely of the top management.

    #The Essay on the Techniques of Co-Ordination (How to Achieve Co-Ordination?):

    #Clearly Defined Goals:

    The goals of the enterprise should be laid down clearly. Every individual in the enterprise should understand the overall objectives and the contribution of his job to these objectives.

    #Precise and Comprehensive Programmes and Policies:

    Laying down well-defined programmes and policies is another measure for achieving effective coordination. This brings uniformity of action because everybody understands the programmes and policies which act as guides for taking decisions.

    #Clear Lines of Authority and Responsibility:

    An enterprise is composed of several vertical and horizontal authority relationships. Authority flows from the top through various positions down to the level of operative workers. There is a line of authority in every enterprise which indicates that who is accountable to whom. This line of authority and responsibility should be clearly defined to achieve co­ordination.

    #Effective Communication:

    Effective communication is key to proper coordination. The channel of communication used in the enterprise should be reliable so that they are able to create proper understanding in the mind of the receiver. As advised by Mary Follett, personal contacts should be encouraged as it is the most effective means of communications for achieving coordination.

    #Effective Leadership and Supervision:

    Management can achieve better coordination through effective leadership and supervision. Effective leadership ensures coordination both at the planning and the implementing stage. Effective supervision is also necessary to guide the activities of individuals in the proper direction. This will bring unity of action which is essential to coordination.

    #The Essay on the Nature of Co-Ordination:

    Co-ordination means an orderly synchronization of efforts of the people working in the organization for the achievement of organizational objectives. It is a continuous process of achieving unity of purpose in the organization.

    It includes all such deliberate efforts on the part of management whereby efforts of various parts of the enterprise are so blended that they move harmoniously towards the accomplishment of an organizational objective.

    Where a number of persons are working for the achievement of a common purpose, coordination is essential to achieve the purpose and synchronize their efforts. Co-ordination is an all-inclusive principle of organization. It is also the all-inclusive function of management and not just one of its functions.

    Management seeks to achieve co-ordination by performing various functions like planning, organizing, directing and controlling. When all these functions are related to each other harmoniously, co-ordination is achieved. As a matter of fact, coordination is the essence of managing.

    #The Essay on the Importance of Co-Ordination:

    In order to achieve coordination among the subordinates and sub-units, the management performs the functions of planning, organizing, staffing, directing and controlling. Coordination is required in every function of management. Plans of different departments and divisions must be properly coordinated, otherwise, the objectives of the organization as a whole cannot be accomplished,

    Co-ordination is equally important in organizing. All activities required to achieve the desired objectives must be properly grouped and assigned to the right people. In staffing, a balance must be attained between job requirements and the qualities of the personnel who are placed on different jobs.

    The direct function of management is an attempt at achieving coordination. Supervision, motivation, leadership, and communication are designed to secure unity of action in a group. Co-ordination is also involved in controlling. Corrective measures must be synchronized with the cause and time of deviations from the desired performance.

    Thus, coordination is the silken thread running through the entire process of management. That is why it is called the essence of management.

    Co-ordination results in the creation of a true whole that is larger than the sum total of its parts. The analogy of the conductor of a symphony orchestra is appropriate here. The conductor by his coordinating skills of vision, leadership and simultaneous attention to the totality of the orchestra group and its individual instrument players, creates a living musical performance and not mere noise.

    In any case, management has no alternative but to perform mediating, moderating and motivating roles in securing coordinated action. Mediation with the external environment, moderation while controlling internal environment and motivation of individual organizational members are integral coordinating functions of management.

  • Different types Theories of Organization

    Different types Theories of Organization

    Here are Different types Theories of Organization

    First, remembering What is an Organization? it is very helpful for understanding Theories of Organization “An organized group of people with a particular purpose, such as a business or government department. The action of organizing something, the quality of being systematic and efficient. The way in which the elements of a whole are arranged.”

    Organization theory means the study of structure, functioning, and performance of an organization and the behavior of individuals and groups in it. 14 Principles of Management by Henri Fayol.

    The Five type theories of Organization are:
    1. Classical theory
    2. Neo-classical theory
    3. Modern theory
    4. Motivation theory
    5. Decision theory

    Now, Explanation of each Theory following are;

    Classical Theory

    It was found by F.W.Taylor, father of scientific management.

    This theory is base on the following four principles

    Division of labor: The production of a commodity is divide into the maximum number of different divisions. The work of each division is look after by different persons. Each person is specialize in a particular work. In other words, the work is assign to a person according to his specialization and the interest he has in the work. The division of labor results in the maximum production or output with minimum expenses incurred and minimum capital employed.

    Scalar and functional processes: The scalar process deals with the growth of organization vertically. The functional process deals with the growth of organization horizontally. The scalar principles refer to the existence of the relationship between superior and subordinate. In this way, the superior gives instructions or orders to subordinates of various levels of management and gets back the information from the subordinate regarding the operations carried out at different levels or stages. This information is used for the purpose of taking the decision or remedial action to achieve the main objectives of the business.

    The scalar chain means the succession of domination by the superior on the subordinate from the top to the bottom of an organization. The line of authority is base on the principle of unity of command which means that each subordinate does work under one superior only. Reward Strategy with Developing System for Your Organization.

    Structure: The organization structure may define as the prescribe patterns of work-related behavior of workers which result in the accomplishment of organizational objectives. Specialization and coordination are the main issues in the design of an organizational structure.

    The span of control: It means an effective supervision of a maximum number of persons by a supervisor.

    To summarize, classical theory emphasizes the unity of command and principle of coordination. Most of the manager’s time is wasted in coordination and control of the subordinates. According to Lyndall Urwick, “A superior can supervise a maximum of four members at higher levels and between 8-12 members at lower levels to constitute an ideal span of control.”

    Characteristics of classical theory

    • It is base on the division of labor.
    • It’s base on objectives and tasks of the organization.
    • Concerns with the formal organization.
    • It’s base on the coordination of efforts.
    • Division of labor has to balance by unity of command.
    • It fixes a responsibility and accountability for work completion.
    • It is centralize.

    Neo-classical Theory

    It is developed to fill up gaps and deficiencies in the classical theory and is concerns with human relations movement. The study of an organization is base on human behavior such as how people behave and why they do so in a particular situation. The main contribution of this theory highlights the importance of the committee management and better communication. Further, this theory emphasizes that the workers should encourage and motivate to evince active participation in the production process. The feelings and sentiments of the workers should be taken into account and respect before any change is introduce in the organization. The classical theory was production oriented while neo-classical theory was people oriented.

    Contributions of neo-classical theory

    • A person should the basis of an organization.
    • Organization should be view as a total unit.
    • Individual goals and organization goals should integrate.
    • Communication should move from bottom to top and from top to bottom.
    • People should allow to participate in fixing work standards and decision making.
    • The employee should given more power, responsibility, authority and control.
    • Members usually belong to formal and informal groups and interact with others within each group or sub-group.
    • The management should recognize the existence of the informal organization.
    • The members of sub-groups are attach with common objectives.

    Modern Organization Theory

    This theory is compose of the ideas of different approaches to management development. The approach is fully base on empirical research data and has an integrating nature. The approach reflects the formal and informal structure of the organization and due weight age is giving to the status and roles of personnel in an organization.

    1. The modern theory studies the individuals in aggregates and the movement of individuals in and out of the system.
    2. It studies the interaction of individuals with the environment found in the system.
    3. It studies the interaction among individuals in the system.

    Modern theories include the systems approach, the socio-technical approach, and the contingency or situational approach.

    Systems approach: It considers the organization as a system composed of a set of inter-related and thus mutually dependent sub-systems, linking processes and goals.

    Socio-technical approach: It considers the organization as composed of a social system, technical system, and its environment. These interact among themselves and it is necessary to balance them appropriately for the effective functioning of the organization.

    Contingency or situational approach: It recognizes that organizational systems are inter-relate with their environment and that different environments require different organizational relationships for effective working of the organization.

    The following are essentials of modern theory

    1. It views the organizations as a whole.
    2. It’s base on systems analysis.
    3. The findings of this theory are base on empirical approach.
    4. Integrating into nature.
    5. Gives importance to inter-disciplinary approach to organizational analysis.
    6. Concentrates on both quantitative and behavioral sciences.
    7. It’s not a unified body of knowledge.

    Motivation Theory

    It is concerned with the study of work motivation of employees of the organization. The works are perform effectively if proper motivation is giving to the employees. The motivation may be in monetary as well as non-monetary terms, the inner talents of any person can identifies after giving adequate motivation to employees.

    Decision Theory

    This theory was giving by Herbert A. Simon who was award Nobel Prize in the year 1978 for it. He regarded organization as a structure of decision makers. The decisions was taking at all levels of the organization and important policy decisions was taking at higher levels of the organization. Simon suggest that the organizational structure is design through an examination of the points at which decisions must made and the persons from whom information is require if decisions should satisfactory.

    Different types Theories of Organization - ilearnlot

  • How to Set the Right Goals?

    How to Set the Right Goals?

    A goal is a desired result or possible outcome that a person or a system envisions, plans and commits to achieve: a personal or organizational desired end-point in some sort of assumed development. Many people endeavor to reach goals within a finite time by setting deadlines.

    It is roughly similar to purpose or aim, the anticipated result which guides reaction, or an end, which is an object, either a physical object or an abstract object, that has intrinsic value.

    Setting the Goals

    Goal setting may involve establishing specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bounded (SMART) objectives, but not all researchers agree that these SMART criteria are necessary.

    Research on goal setting by Edwin A. Locke and his colleagues suggests that goal setting can serve as an effective tool for making progress when it ensures that group members have a clear awareness of what each person must do to achieve a shared objective. On a personal level, the process of setting goals allows individuals to specify and then work toward their own objectives (such as financial or career-based goals). Goal-setting comprises a major component of personal development and management.

    Goals can be long-term, intermediate, or short-term. The primary difference is the time required to achieve them.

    Short-term goals

    Short-term goals expect accomplishment in a short period of time, such as trying to get a bill paid in the next few days. The definition of a short-term goal need not relate to any specific length of time. In other words, one may achieve (or fail to achieve) a short-term goal in a day, week, month, year, etc. The time-frame for a short-term goal relates to its context in the overall time line that it is being applied to. For instance, one could measure a short-term goal for a month-long project in days; whereas one might measure a short-term goal for someone’s lifetime in months or in years. Planners usually define short-term goals in relation to long-term goals.

    In any endeavor, the first step is to establish a clear goal. The more detailed and clear it is, the easier it will be for you to make choices and establish steps that you need to take towards accomplishing it.

    However, before getting into the subject of setting goals, let us first talk about the Goal-Setting Theory of Locke and Latham. Learning this will help you visualize the results that you truly want and need.

    Dr. Edwin Locke, the author of the article “Toward a Theory of Task Motivation and Incentives”, published in 1968, explained that people become motivated towards doing their job when they are given clear goals as well as proper feedback. He also pointed that having a specific and challenging goal motivates people to boost their performance.

    Twelve years later, Locke and Dr. Gary Latham published “A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance,” their seminal work. It not only highlighted the significance of setting definite and challenging goals, but also provided five key components that will guide you to set them successfully. These are Clarity, Challenge, Commitment, Feedback, and Task Complexity. Here are the steps on how you can use them:

    Establish clear goals.

    It is important to be detailed with what you want to accomplish. By doing so, you can track your progress and determine which areas you need to improve on and which ones are helping you to get closer to your goal.

    Perhaps the most efficient way to establish goals is by applying the SMART criteria. This was first explained by George T. Doran in the November 1981 issue of Management Review. It has since become the primary tool used in setting goals.

    “SMART” stands for Specific, Measurable, Achievable (or Assignable), Relevant, and Time-bound. Here is how you can apply each criterion:

    1. Specific – the goal has to be so clear it leaves no room for doubt. Detail what is important to you, what you expect from it, how you will know when it happens, and so on.
    2. Measurable – this puts emphasis on the need for measurable factors to help determine whether you are improving or not. Without measurable factors, you would find it impossible to stay motivated.
    3. Assignable or Achievable – a goal may be specific and measurable, but it can be unachievable if it is unrealistic. It is important to ensure that you can either achieve the goal-related tasks yourself, or assign some of the tasks to someone who can.
    4. Relevant – it is important to work towards a goal that is in line with your principles and purpose in life. For instance, you can consider whether the goal is worth the time, energy, and resources and if it is of true value to you.
    5. Time-bound – a time frame is an essential part of goal setting, because it helps you commit and increases your focus. A goal that is not time-bound is usually shipped off to “someday” land and never seen again. Therefore, you must set a target date.

    Here is an example of a SMART goal: “I will finish writing the first draft of my twenty-thousand-word romance fiction novel entitled “Oceans Away from Sarah” before December 25, 2016.”

    Set the Right Goals

    Ensure that the goals are challenging

    The more challenging yet realistic a goal is, the more motivated you will be to accomplish it. First, consider whether the goal you want makes you feel excited. Why does the thought of accomplishing it makes you feel good? Visualize the goal and determine the steps you need to take to turn it into a reality.

    Commit yourself to the goal

    Committing to your goal means that you are going to devote your time, energy, and resources to accomplish it. It also means you recognize its importance in your life and that you will not give up. It also helps to remember that plans can change, but the goal should remain the same.

    Track your Progress to Get Feedback

    As you work towards your goal, you must continuously enhance your skills, plans, and tools. That way, you can become even more efficient and effective. The only way to know how and what to improve on is by receiving feedback.

    Feedback is easily given by a team leader and one’s peers in major projects, but if you are on your own, then you need to track your own progress to receive it. Therefore, you must create a way to measure your progress as soon as you start working towards your goal. Through these standards, you can determine how far along you are.

    Calibrate the complexity of the task

    If a certain task towards your goal is too challenging it becomes unrealistic, you can take a step back and make the necessary adjustments. In other words, do not charge head-on if you are unprepared for it, because you will only end up feeling too pressured. This is dangerous, because it can cause you to give up altogether.

    Instead, consider the factors that are causing the task to be too complex. Reflect on whether you need more time, additional skills, or better tools for it. Maybe you need to break it down into smaller, more manageable parts. It is also possible that you need to delegate it to an expert. All these adjustments may even help you achieve your goal more efficiently.

    Once you have established a clear goal, the next step is to generate tasks that are in line with it. By doing so, you would then be able to determine the time you need to accomplish it. How to Set Your Organize Priorities? posts will help you to identify which tasks are important each day, and which ones to set aside.

  • Importance with Techniques of Coordination

    Importance with Techniques of Coordination

    First, Some Understand the meaning of Coordination:

    Coordination is much essential in management. Business has various functions. These functions are performed by different individuals.

    Moreover, the performance of these functions requires a division of work and grouping of activities and making decisions at different levels.

    All these necessitate coordination for attaining the desired goals. Coordination is concerned with synchronizing, integrating or unifying all the group actions in an enterprise to achieve its objectives.

    It is a process by which the manager achieves harmonious group efforts and unity of actions through balancing the activities of different individuals and groups of individuals and reconciling their differences in interest or approach, for the attainment of common goals.

    [perfectpullquote align=”right” cite=”” link=”” color=”blue” class=”” size=””]According to Mcfarland, “Coordination is the process whereby an executive develops an orderly pattern of group efforts among his subordinates and secures unity of actions in the pursuit of a common purpose.”[/perfectpullquote]

    Now, Here is Importance of Coordination

    I. Unity of action: An enterprise has diverse resources; technique, activities etc and they all must be coordinated to bring unity through unity in action.

    II. Increase in efficiency and economy: Coordination brings efficiency because it is an effort of all organizational members. It also helps to maintain good relation among all levels of management.

    III. Development of personnel: Coordination helps to obtain information about job, qualities of a job holder which helps to analyze about the potentialities of the job holder and improve coordination system.

    IV. Differential perception: Different people have a different perception. When all people are coordinated effectively their effort and power are concentrated to achieve organizational goals.

    V. Survival of the organization: Coordination helps o harmonize the work resources and physical facilities. When their activities are not harmonized the organization can’t achieve the goal and it can’t survive in the society.

    VI. The accomplishment of objectives: When the employees, their task, and available resources are coordinated, their production will be increased and it helps to accomplish the objectives of the organization.

    VII. The basis of managerial function: All managerial functions such as planning, organizing, directing, controlling etc can’t be conducted effectively without communication.

    VIII. Specialization: In the absence of coordination in the organization the activities can’t be moved in specialized areas. Therefore, it helps in specialization.

    And, Finally Here are Techniques of Coordination

    I. Well defined goals: The first means or technique of coordination is well-defined goals. The goals of the organization should be clear and well defined. Each individual in the organization should understand the overall goals. When the goals are not well defined the coordination may not effective.

    II. Sound organization structure: Coordination is the essence of management. It is not possible without sound organization structure. The authority and responsibility for each and every positions and employee should be clearly defined.

    III. Effective communication: Coordination helps in creating proper understanding among persons. Without effective communication, coordination may be effective. The ideas, opinions should be interchanged freely. It is only through effective communication that even individual understand his/her limitations, positions, and responsibility in the organization. Effective communication helps in coordination. Therefore, it is also an important means of coordination.

    IV. Proper leadership: Proper leadership leads the subordinates effectively and efficiently. A good managerial leader uses the motivational tools to coordinate the employees with an effective communication system. In short, coordination is made possible through proper leadership.

    V. Proper supervision: Supervisors coordinate the subordinates and their activities. Top level management cannot coordinate all employees. In short, proper supervision helps in effective coordination.

    VI. Better plans and policies: Coordination is made according to plans and policies of the organization and departments. When the plans and policies are not better coordination is not effective in the organization.

    VII. Cooperation: Without cooperation, coordination may not succeed because coordination is related to employees and their activities. When they are not cooperative, coordination may not be made. So, cooperation is essential in the organization.

    VIII. Meeting and conference: Coordination may be possible when all employees their all activities and departmental goals are involved in organizational planning and policies. They’re all problems and matters may be involved. When there is an environment of constructive discussion and debate with meeting and conference.

    XI. Group decision: The group decision is a decision in which all members of the organization are participated to make decisions. The ideas and feelings are mixed into the decision and coordination may succeed.

    Notes: Here are you have read it Importance with Techniques of Coordination, last post you might be read it; Principles of Coordination. And, Maybe You will read it; The definitions of all the Seven Processes of Scientific Management; Planning, Organizing, Staffing, Directing, Coordinating, Motivating, Controlling.

  • What are the Principles of Coordination? Explains

    Principles of Coordination; First. Some Discuss Coordination – The effectiveness of a system relates to its ability to fulfill its functional requirements. When a system consists of a set of collaborating agents, the overall performance may depend more on their ability to work together than on optimizing individual behavior. The goal of an agent is often at odds with the interest of the collective. The limitations of centralized control for complex systems suggest the need for decentralized coordination. This can achieve by having each agent take explicit account of the cost of engaging in an activity as well as a measure of reward for competent behavior.

    Here are Explains, What are the Principles of Coordination? 10 types of Principles.

    The consideration of payoffs and penalties leads to an economic perspective of multi-agent systems. In consequence, it is possible to draw on previous work in diverse fields, ranging from game theory to welfare economics and social policy. The promise and limitations of the explicit valuation approach examine. To illustrate, the behavior of collaborative systems can interpret in terms of games of strategy; this approach permits a better understanding of the conditions for globally optimal behavior, as well as strategies for their attainment. The notions of agents and the explicit valuation of action are versatile concepts. One indication of the versatility lies in the fact that these concepts cover as a special case the idea of genetic algorithms as a mechanism for learning systems.

    Now, Here are Principles of Coordination;

    Simplified organization:

    Authority, responsibility, duty, and other job descriptions should clearly describe by the organization. Also, Coordination may be simple and easy when all duties and power simplify.

    Harmonized programs and policies:

    An organization must set the programs and policies. These programs and policies must harmonize. Harmonized policies help to make coordination effective.

    Well, the designed system of communication:

    Without effective communication coordination and harmonizing activities is not possible. Therefore, the communication system must well design.

    Voluntary cooperation:

    Are voluntarily cooperated when all behave voluntarily cooperated, then only coordination can be successful.

    Coordination through supervision:

    Supervisors are the most important actor to coordinate the workers and their work. Mainly in all organization supervisors coordinate the resources and activities.

    Continuity:

    It is a never-ending process. When it is done continuously, the resources are not used effectively and they cannot contribute.

    Direct contact:

    Direct contact is necessary for effective coordination. Face to face contact may provide more effectiveness. Direct personal contact removes misunderstanding and conflict between departments or between personnel. It involves direct face to face communication, personal discussion, settlement of differences, exchanges of ideas between the personnel.

    Clearly defined goals:

    Organizational goals and other departmental goals must clearly define otherwise it isn’t easy to coordinate the resources and activities.

    Effective leadership:

    Leadership must be effective. As well as, It helps o increase the confidence of employees and it develops the morale of workers. Also, Effective leadership helps ineffective coordination.

    Continuous Process:

    Coordination is a continuous process and must go on all the time. In contrast to the principle of continuity, the difference of opinions and information gap may appear and misunderstanding in interdepartmental operations may crop up in the absence of coordination. By keeping the process of coordination as a continuous flow of information, sound coordination can be ensured in an enterprise.

    Notes: Here are you have read it Principles of Coordination. And, Maybe You will read it; The definitions of all the Seven Processes of Scientific Management; Planning, Organizing, Staffing, Directing, Coordinating, Motivating, Controlling. You will be reading this post about; What are the Functions of the Organization. Do you read it What is a Management and Organization?, Next Notes of Article Importance with Techniques of Coordination.