Tag: Coordinating

  • Coordinating Conjunctions Examples

    Coordinating Conjunctions Examples

    Learn how coordinating conjunctions can elevate your writing. This comprehensive guide explores the seven primary coordinating conjunctions – for, and, nor, but, or, yet, and so – detailing their functions and common usage mistakes. Understand their role in linking words, phrases, and clauses to create clear, concise, and coherent sentences. Enhance your writing skills by mastering these essential grammar tools.

    Introduction to Coordinating Conjunctions

    Coordinating conjunctions are fundamental components of English grammar, serving as essential tools for connecting words, phrases, and clauses. These conjunctions play a pivotal role in developing complex and coherent sentences, enhancing both written and spoken communication. Coordinating conjunctions are primarily responsible for linking elements of similar grammatical structure, thus ensuring a seamless flow of ideas and enhancing overall readability.

    Examples of Coordinating Conjunctions

    There are seven primary coordinating conjunctions in the English language: for, and, nor, but, or, yet, and so. Each of these conjunctions serves a unique function in sentence construction:

    • For: Indicates reason or purpose (because).
    • And: Adds one element to another.
    • Nor: Presents a negative alternative.
    • But: Introduces a contrast or exception.
    • Or: Offers an alternative or choice.
    • Yet: Suggests a contrast or exception, similar to “but”.
    • So: Expresses a consequence or result.

    The importance of coordinating conjunctions lies in their ability to link together different parts of a sentence, thereby creating a more intricate and detailed expression of thoughts. For example, consider the sentence: “I wanted to go for a walk, but it started raining.” Here, the coordinating conjunction “but” effectively connects two contrasting ideas, making the sentence more meaningful and nuanced.

    Another example is: “She studied hard, so she passed the exam.” In this case, “so” joins the cause (“She studied hard”) with the effect (“she passed the exam”), highlighting the relationship between the two actions. Through such examples, it becomes evident that mastering coordinating conjunctions is crucial for constructing clear, concise, and dynamic sentences.

    How to Use Coordinating Conjunctions

    Coordinating conjunctions are essential tools in writing. They connect words, phrases, and clauses that are grammatically equal or similar. The most common coordinating conjunctions are for, and, nor, but, or, yet, and so. You can remember them easily with the acronym FANBOYS.

    Basic Usage

    • For: Explains reason or purpose (similar to because)
      • I will buy some snacks, for I am feeling hungry.
    • And: Adds one thing to another
      • She likes reading, and she enjoys writing.
    • Nor: Used to present an alternative negative idea to an already stated negative idea
      • He doesn’t drink milk, nor does he eat cheese.
    • But: Shows contrast
      • I wanted to go to the park, but it started raining.
    • Or: Presents an alternative
      • Would you like tea, or would you prefer coffee?
    • Yet: Introduces a contrasting idea that follows logically from the previous idea
      • The weather was cold, yet we went for a swim.
    • So: Indicates effect, result, or consequence
      • She was tired, so she went to bed early.

    Points to Remember

    1. Comma Usage: When a coordinating conjunction joins two independent clauses, a comma is usually placed before the conjunction.
      • I wanted to buy a new book, but the store was closed.
    2. Joining Words or Phrases: When joining words or phrases that are not independent clauses, no comma is needed.
      • She enjoys hiking and camping.
    3. Consistency: Ensure that the parts being joined are parallel in structure.
      • Incorrect: He likes to swim and biking.
      • Correct: He likes swimming and biking.

    By mastering coordinating conjunctions, you can write more cohesive and engaging sentences that clearly convey your intended meaning.

    Detailed Exploration of Each Coordinating Conjunction

    Coordinating conjunctions are essential components of the English language, serving to connect words, phrases, and clauses. Understanding their specific uses and nuances is crucial for mastering their application. This section provides a comprehensive exploration of each of the seven coordinating conjunctions: for, and, nor, but, or, yet, and so.

    The conjunction ‘for’ is primarily used to explain a reason or cause. It functions similarly to ‘because’ but is typically used in more formal contexts. For instance, “She opened the windows, for it was too hot inside,” clearly indicates the reason for opening the windows.

    ‘And’ is one of the most versatile coordinating conjunctions, used to connect similar ideas or add information. An example would be, “He likes to read and write,” where ‘and’ links two related activities, emphasizing their connection.

    The conjunction ‘nor’ is employed to add a negative element to an already negative statement, often following ‘neither.’ For example, “She neither called nor texted,” uses ‘nor’ to extend the negation to another action.

    Contrast is indicated by the conjunction ‘but.’ It highlights a difference or an exception. Consider the sentence, “She was tired, but she continued working.” Here, ‘but’ shows a contrast between her fatigue and her determination to continue working.

    ‘Or’ is used to present choices or alternatives. For example, “Would you like tea or coffee?” offers a choice between two options. ‘Or’ helps clarify that only one of the listed options is applicable or preferred.

    The conjunction ‘yet’ also expresses contrast, but it does so in a slightly different manner than ‘but.’ It often introduces an unexpected outcome. An example is, “He worked hard, yet he didn’t pass the exam,” underscoring the surprising outcome despite the efforts.

    Finally, ‘so’ is employed to indicate a result or consequence. For example, “It started raining, so we took shelter,” demonstrates a cause (rain) leading to a specific result (taking shelter).

    Understanding the distinct functions of each coordinating conjunction enhances language proficiency. By utilizing them accurately, one can create more precise and varied sentences, enriching both written and spoken communication.

    Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

    Coordinating conjunctions play a pivotal role in ensuring the clarity and cohesiveness of written and spoken language. However, their misuse can lead to a variety of common mistakes that disrupt the flow and meaning of sentences. By understanding and correcting these mistakes, writers and speakers can enhance their communication skills significantly.

    One frequent error is the comma splice, which occurs when two independent clauses are joined solely by a comma without an appropriate coordinating conjunction. For instance, the incorrect sentence “I wanted to go for a walk, it was raining outside” can be corrected to “I wanted to go for a walk, but it was raining outside.” Here, the coordinating conjunction “but” links the two clauses properly.

    Another common issue is the run-on sentence, where two or more independent clauses are connected improperly, often without any punctuation or conjunction. For example, “She loves to read she goes to the library every week” should be corrected to “She loves to read, so she goes to the library every week.” The conjunction “so” effectively ties the clauses together.

    Misunderstanding the placement and usage of coordinating conjunctions can also lead to errors. It’s essential to remember that conjunctions should connect grammatically equivalent elements. For example, in the incorrect sentence “He enjoys swimming and to run,” there is a failure in maintaining parallelism. The correct sentence should be “He enjoys swimming and running,” ensuring both elements are in the same grammatical form.

    To avoid these mistakes, familiarize yourself with the punctuation rules associated with coordinating conjunctions. When joining two independent clauses, always use a comma followed by the appropriate conjunction. Additionally, ensure that the elements connected by the conjunctions are parallel in structure. Regular practice and review of these rules can significantly reduce the likelihood of errors.

    Utilizing these strategies can help writers and speakers alike to master the use of coordinating conjunctions, thus enhancing the effectiveness and coherence of their communication.

    Enhancing Writing with Coordinating Conjunctions

    Coordinating conjunctions, when used adeptly, can significantly elevate the quality and readability of your writing. Stylistically, they serve to create seamless flow, vary sentence structure, and add emphasis or flair. Understandably, mastering their use is a valuable skill for any writer aiming to enhance their prose.

    Creating flow within a piece of writing is crucial for reader engagement. Coordinating conjunctions such as “and,” “but,” and “so” facilitate smooth transitions between ideas, ensuring that the text is coherent and easy to follow. For instance, in professional literature, you often encounter sentences designed to connect thoughts fluidly: “The new policy was implemented in June, and its effects were immediately noticeable.”

    Diversifying sentence structure is another significant benefit of using coordinating conjunctions. Overuse of simple sentences can render writing monotonous. By integrating conjunctions like “for,” “or,” “yet,” and “nor,” one can create compound sentences that enrich the text. Consider this literary example: “She wanted to travel the world, yet her responsibilities at home kept her grounded.” The variation in sentence length and structure keeps the reader engaged and adds a dynamic quality to the narrative.

    Moreover, coordinating conjunctions can be employed to emphasize particular aspects of your writing. This is especially effective in argumentative or persuasive contexts. A carefully placed “but” or “so” can highlight contrasts or results, thereby guiding the reader’s focus. For example: “The project was challenging, but the team managed to complete it on time.

    Practical exercises can further hone your skills in using coordinating conjunctions. Try crafting sentences that combine different conjunctions to practice their stylistic effects. Additionally, reading various genres of writing and paying attention to how seasoned authors incorporate these conjunctions can provide valuable insights.

    In conclusion, the strategic use of coordinating conjunctions can transform standard writing into articulate, engaging prose. Whether you are penning a narrative, developing an argument, or crafting descriptive passages, these small but mighty words are essential tools for any writer.

  • Processes of Scientific Management

    Explaining The Processes of Scientific Management!

    Management is an art and science and it is a continuous activity. It is a factor of production and it is an organized activity. Management aims at maximizing profit with ethical behavior. It is a profession by itself and involves decision making. It is needed in all levels and develops leadership qualities in people. Planning, organizing, staffing, directing, coordinating, motivating and controlling are the functions of management. How to Explain Techniques of Scientific Management?

    Seven types of Processes of Scientific Management

    • Planning.
    • Organizing.
    • Staffing.
    • Directing.
    • Coordinating.
    • Motivating, and.
    • Controlling.

    Processes of Scientific Management
    //www.whitestein.com/sites/default/files/shutterstock_259293593.png

    Explanation of following Processes of Scientific Management

    Planning

    The process of making plans for something.

    The control of urban development by a local government authority, from which a license must be obtained to build a new property or change an existing one.

    Organizing

    Arrange systematically; order. coordinate the activities of (a person or group) efficiently. form (a number of people) into a trade union or other political group.

    Make arrangements or preparations for (an event or activity). take responsibility for providing or arranging.

    Staffing

    Staffing is the process of hiring, positioning and overseeing employees in an organization.

    Definition of staffing: The selection and training of individuals for specific job functions, and charging them with the associated responsibilities.

    Directing

    Control the operations of; manage or govern. supervise and control (a film, play, or other production, or the actors in it).

    Aim (something) in a particular direction or at a particular person. focus (one’s thoughts) on or address (one’s efforts) towards something.

    Give (someone) an official order or authoritative instruction.

    Coordinating

    Bring the different elements of (a complex activity or organization) into a harmonious or efficient relationship. negotiate with others in order to work together effectively. match or harmonize attractively.

    Motivating

    Provide (someone) with a reason for doing something. cause (someone) to have an interest in or enthusiasm for something. request (something) and present facts and arguments in support of one’s request.

    Controlling

    Determine the behavior or supervise the running of. maintain influence or authority over. limit the level, intensity, or numbers of. remain calm and reasonable despite provocation.

    Take into account (an extraneous factor that might affect the results of an experiment).

    What is Scientific Management; Also called Taylorism is a theory of management that analyzes and synthesizes workflows. Its main objective is improving economic efficiency, especially labor productivity. It was one of the earliest attempts to apply science to the engineering of processes and to management. How Do You Know Your Company Wants Help From The Outside?

    The Processes of Scientific Management - ilearnlot
    //www.sebpo.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/business-efficiency.jpg

    Notes: You will come to know the definitions of all the seven Processes of Scientific Management; Planning, Organizing, Staffing, Directing, Coordinating, Motivating, Controlling.

  • Different types Theories of Organization

    Different types Theories of Organization

    Here are Different types Theories of Organization

    First, remembering What is an Organization? it is very helpful for understanding Theories of Organization “An organized group of people with a particular purpose, such as a business or government department. The action of organizing something, the quality of being systematic and efficient. The way in which the elements of a whole are arranged.”

    Organization theory means the study of structure, functioning, and performance of an organization and the behavior of individuals and groups in it. 14 Principles of Management by Henri Fayol.

    The Five type theories of Organization are:
    1. Classical theory
    2. Neo-classical theory
    3. Modern theory
    4. Motivation theory
    5. Decision theory

    Now, Explanation of each Theory following are;

    Classical Theory

    It was found by F.W.Taylor, father of scientific management.

    This theory is base on the following four principles

    Division of labor: The production of a commodity is divide into the maximum number of different divisions. The work of each division is look after by different persons. Each person is specialize in a particular work. In other words, the work is assign to a person according to his specialization and the interest he has in the work. The division of labor results in the maximum production or output with minimum expenses incurred and minimum capital employed.

    Scalar and functional processes: The scalar process deals with the growth of organization vertically. The functional process deals with the growth of organization horizontally. The scalar principles refer to the existence of the relationship between superior and subordinate. In this way, the superior gives instructions or orders to subordinates of various levels of management and gets back the information from the subordinate regarding the operations carried out at different levels or stages. This information is used for the purpose of taking the decision or remedial action to achieve the main objectives of the business.

    The scalar chain means the succession of domination by the superior on the subordinate from the top to the bottom of an organization. The line of authority is base on the principle of unity of command which means that each subordinate does work under one superior only. Reward Strategy with Developing System for Your Organization.

    Structure: The organization structure may define as the prescribe patterns of work-related behavior of workers which result in the accomplishment of organizational objectives. Specialization and coordination are the main issues in the design of an organizational structure.

    The span of control: It means an effective supervision of a maximum number of persons by a supervisor.

    To summarize, classical theory emphasizes the unity of command and principle of coordination. Most of the manager’s time is wasted in coordination and control of the subordinates. According to Lyndall Urwick, “A superior can supervise a maximum of four members at higher levels and between 8-12 members at lower levels to constitute an ideal span of control.”

    Characteristics of classical theory

    • It is base on the division of labor.
    • It’s base on objectives and tasks of the organization.
    • Concerns with the formal organization.
    • It’s base on the coordination of efforts.
    • Division of labor has to balance by unity of command.
    • It fixes a responsibility and accountability for work completion.
    • It is centralize.

    Neo-classical Theory

    It is developed to fill up gaps and deficiencies in the classical theory and is concerns with human relations movement. The study of an organization is base on human behavior such as how people behave and why they do so in a particular situation. The main contribution of this theory highlights the importance of the committee management and better communication. Further, this theory emphasizes that the workers should encourage and motivate to evince active participation in the production process. The feelings and sentiments of the workers should be taken into account and respect before any change is introduce in the organization. The classical theory was production oriented while neo-classical theory was people oriented.

    Contributions of neo-classical theory

    • A person should the basis of an organization.
    • Organization should be view as a total unit.
    • Individual goals and organization goals should integrate.
    • Communication should move from bottom to top and from top to bottom.
    • People should allow to participate in fixing work standards and decision making.
    • The employee should given more power, responsibility, authority and control.
    • Members usually belong to formal and informal groups and interact with others within each group or sub-group.
    • The management should recognize the existence of the informal organization.
    • The members of sub-groups are attach with common objectives.

    Modern Organization Theory

    This theory is compose of the ideas of different approaches to management development. The approach is fully base on empirical research data and has an integrating nature. The approach reflects the formal and informal structure of the organization and due weight age is giving to the status and roles of personnel in an organization.

    1. The modern theory studies the individuals in aggregates and the movement of individuals in and out of the system.
    2. It studies the interaction of individuals with the environment found in the system.
    3. It studies the interaction among individuals in the system.

    Modern theories include the systems approach, the socio-technical approach, and the contingency or situational approach.

    Systems approach: It considers the organization as a system composed of a set of inter-related and thus mutually dependent sub-systems, linking processes and goals.

    Socio-technical approach: It considers the organization as composed of a social system, technical system, and its environment. These interact among themselves and it is necessary to balance them appropriately for the effective functioning of the organization.

    Contingency or situational approach: It recognizes that organizational systems are inter-relate with their environment and that different environments require different organizational relationships for effective working of the organization.

    The following are essentials of modern theory

    1. It views the organizations as a whole.
    2. It’s base on systems analysis.
    3. The findings of this theory are base on empirical approach.
    4. Integrating into nature.
    5. Gives importance to inter-disciplinary approach to organizational analysis.
    6. Concentrates on both quantitative and behavioral sciences.
    7. It’s not a unified body of knowledge.

    Motivation Theory

    It is concerned with the study of work motivation of employees of the organization. The works are perform effectively if proper motivation is giving to the employees. The motivation may be in monetary as well as non-monetary terms, the inner talents of any person can identifies after giving adequate motivation to employees.

    Decision Theory

    This theory was giving by Herbert A. Simon who was award Nobel Prize in the year 1978 for it. He regarded organization as a structure of decision makers. The decisions was taking at all levels of the organization and important policy decisions was taking at higher levels of the organization. Simon suggest that the organizational structure is design through an examination of the points at which decisions must made and the persons from whom information is require if decisions should satisfactory.

    Different types Theories of Organization - ilearnlot

  • How to Set the Right Goals?

    How to Set the Right Goals?

    A goal is a desired result or possible outcome that a person or a system envisions, plans and commits to achieve: a personal or organizational desired end-point in some sort of assumed development. Many people endeavor to reach goals within a finite time by setting deadlines.

    It is roughly similar to purpose or aim, the anticipated result which guides reaction, or an end, which is an object, either a physical object or an abstract object, that has intrinsic value.

    Setting the Goals

    Goal setting may involve establishing specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bounded (SMART) objectives, but not all researchers agree that these SMART criteria are necessary.

    Research on goal setting by Edwin A. Locke and his colleagues suggests that goal setting can serve as an effective tool for making progress when it ensures that group members have a clear awareness of what each person must do to achieve a shared objective. On a personal level, the process of setting goals allows individuals to specify and then work toward their own objectives (such as financial or career-based goals). Goal-setting comprises a major component of personal development and management.

    Goals can be long-term, intermediate, or short-term. The primary difference is the time required to achieve them.

    Short-term goals

    Short-term goals expect accomplishment in a short period of time, such as trying to get a bill paid in the next few days. The definition of a short-term goal need not relate to any specific length of time. In other words, one may achieve (or fail to achieve) a short-term goal in a day, week, month, year, etc. The time-frame for a short-term goal relates to its context in the overall time line that it is being applied to. For instance, one could measure a short-term goal for a month-long project in days; whereas one might measure a short-term goal for someone’s lifetime in months or in years. Planners usually define short-term goals in relation to long-term goals.

    In any endeavor, the first step is to establish a clear goal. The more detailed and clear it is, the easier it will be for you to make choices and establish steps that you need to take towards accomplishing it.

    However, before getting into the subject of setting goals, let us first talk about the Goal-Setting Theory of Locke and Latham. Learning this will help you visualize the results that you truly want and need.

    Dr. Edwin Locke, the author of the article “Toward a Theory of Task Motivation and Incentives”, published in 1968, explained that people become motivated towards doing their job when they are given clear goals as well as proper feedback. He also pointed that having a specific and challenging goal motivates people to boost their performance.

    Twelve years later, Locke and Dr. Gary Latham published “A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance,” their seminal work. It not only highlighted the significance of setting definite and challenging goals, but also provided five key components that will guide you to set them successfully. These are Clarity, Challenge, Commitment, Feedback, and Task Complexity. Here are the steps on how you can use them:

    Establish clear goals.

    It is important to be detailed with what you want to accomplish. By doing so, you can track your progress and determine which areas you need to improve on and which ones are helping you to get closer to your goal.

    Perhaps the most efficient way to establish goals is by applying the SMART criteria. This was first explained by George T. Doran in the November 1981 issue of Management Review. It has since become the primary tool used in setting goals.

    “SMART” stands for Specific, Measurable, Achievable (or Assignable), Relevant, and Time-bound. Here is how you can apply each criterion:

    1. Specific – the goal has to be so clear it leaves no room for doubt. Detail what is important to you, what you expect from it, how you will know when it happens, and so on.
    2. Measurable – this puts emphasis on the need for measurable factors to help determine whether you are improving or not. Without measurable factors, you would find it impossible to stay motivated.
    3. Assignable or Achievable – a goal may be specific and measurable, but it can be unachievable if it is unrealistic. It is important to ensure that you can either achieve the goal-related tasks yourself, or assign some of the tasks to someone who can.
    4. Relevant – it is important to work towards a goal that is in line with your principles and purpose in life. For instance, you can consider whether the goal is worth the time, energy, and resources and if it is of true value to you.
    5. Time-bound – a time frame is an essential part of goal setting, because it helps you commit and increases your focus. A goal that is not time-bound is usually shipped off to “someday” land and never seen again. Therefore, you must set a target date.

    Here is an example of a SMART goal: “I will finish writing the first draft of my twenty-thousand-word romance fiction novel entitled “Oceans Away from Sarah” before December 25, 2016.”

    Set the Right Goals

    Ensure that the goals are challenging

    The more challenging yet realistic a goal is, the more motivated you will be to accomplish it. First, consider whether the goal you want makes you feel excited. Why does the thought of accomplishing it makes you feel good? Visualize the goal and determine the steps you need to take to turn it into a reality.

    Commit yourself to the goal

    Committing to your goal means that you are going to devote your time, energy, and resources to accomplish it. It also means you recognize its importance in your life and that you will not give up. It also helps to remember that plans can change, but the goal should remain the same.

    Track your Progress to Get Feedback

    As you work towards your goal, you must continuously enhance your skills, plans, and tools. That way, you can become even more efficient and effective. The only way to know how and what to improve on is by receiving feedback.

    Feedback is easily given by a team leader and one’s peers in major projects, but if you are on your own, then you need to track your own progress to receive it. Therefore, you must create a way to measure your progress as soon as you start working towards your goal. Through these standards, you can determine how far along you are.

    Calibrate the complexity of the task

    If a certain task towards your goal is too challenging it becomes unrealistic, you can take a step back and make the necessary adjustments. In other words, do not charge head-on if you are unprepared for it, because you will only end up feeling too pressured. This is dangerous, because it can cause you to give up altogether.

    Instead, consider the factors that are causing the task to be too complex. Reflect on whether you need more time, additional skills, or better tools for it. Maybe you need to break it down into smaller, more manageable parts. It is also possible that you need to delegate it to an expert. All these adjustments may even help you achieve your goal more efficiently.

    Once you have established a clear goal, the next step is to generate tasks that are in line with it. By doing so, you would then be able to determine the time you need to accomplish it. How to Set Your Organize Priorities? posts will help you to identify which tasks are important each day, and which ones to set aside.

  • Importance with Techniques of Coordination

    Importance with Techniques of Coordination

    First, Some Understand the meaning of Coordination:

    Coordination is much essential in management. Business has various functions. These functions are performed by different individuals.

    Moreover, the performance of these functions requires a division of work and grouping of activities and making decisions at different levels.

    All these necessitate coordination for attaining the desired goals. Coordination is concerned with synchronizing, integrating or unifying all the group actions in an enterprise to achieve its objectives.

    It is a process by which the manager achieves harmonious group efforts and unity of actions through balancing the activities of different individuals and groups of individuals and reconciling their differences in interest or approach, for the attainment of common goals.

    [perfectpullquote align=”right” cite=”” link=”” color=”blue” class=”” size=””]According to Mcfarland, “Coordination is the process whereby an executive develops an orderly pattern of group efforts among his subordinates and secures unity of actions in the pursuit of a common purpose.”[/perfectpullquote]

    Now, Here is Importance of Coordination

    I. Unity of action: An enterprise has diverse resources; technique, activities etc and they all must be coordinated to bring unity through unity in action.

    II. Increase in efficiency and economy: Coordination brings efficiency because it is an effort of all organizational members. It also helps to maintain good relation among all levels of management.

    III. Development of personnel: Coordination helps to obtain information about job, qualities of a job holder which helps to analyze about the potentialities of the job holder and improve coordination system.

    IV. Differential perception: Different people have a different perception. When all people are coordinated effectively their effort and power are concentrated to achieve organizational goals.

    V. Survival of the organization: Coordination helps o harmonize the work resources and physical facilities. When their activities are not harmonized the organization can’t achieve the goal and it can’t survive in the society.

    VI. The accomplishment of objectives: When the employees, their task, and available resources are coordinated, their production will be increased and it helps to accomplish the objectives of the organization.

    VII. The basis of managerial function: All managerial functions such as planning, organizing, directing, controlling etc can’t be conducted effectively without communication.

    VIII. Specialization: In the absence of coordination in the organization the activities can’t be moved in specialized areas. Therefore, it helps in specialization.

    And, Finally Here are Techniques of Coordination

    I. Well defined goals: The first means or technique of coordination is well-defined goals. The goals of the organization should be clear and well defined. Each individual in the organization should understand the overall goals. When the goals are not well defined the coordination may not effective.

    II. Sound organization structure: Coordination is the essence of management. It is not possible without sound organization structure. The authority and responsibility for each and every positions and employee should be clearly defined.

    III. Effective communication: Coordination helps in creating proper understanding among persons. Without effective communication, coordination may be effective. The ideas, opinions should be interchanged freely. It is only through effective communication that even individual understand his/her limitations, positions, and responsibility in the organization. Effective communication helps in coordination. Therefore, it is also an important means of coordination.

    IV. Proper leadership: Proper leadership leads the subordinates effectively and efficiently. A good managerial leader uses the motivational tools to coordinate the employees with an effective communication system. In short, coordination is made possible through proper leadership.

    V. Proper supervision: Supervisors coordinate the subordinates and their activities. Top level management cannot coordinate all employees. In short, proper supervision helps in effective coordination.

    VI. Better plans and policies: Coordination is made according to plans and policies of the organization and departments. When the plans and policies are not better coordination is not effective in the organization.

    VII. Cooperation: Without cooperation, coordination may not succeed because coordination is related to employees and their activities. When they are not cooperative, coordination may not be made. So, cooperation is essential in the organization.

    VIII. Meeting and conference: Coordination may be possible when all employees their all activities and departmental goals are involved in organizational planning and policies. They’re all problems and matters may be involved. When there is an environment of constructive discussion and debate with meeting and conference.

    XI. Group decision: The group decision is a decision in which all members of the organization are participated to make decisions. The ideas and feelings are mixed into the decision and coordination may succeed.

    Notes: Here are you have read it Importance with Techniques of Coordination, last post you might be read it; Principles of Coordination. And, Maybe You will read it; The definitions of all the Seven Processes of Scientific Management; Planning, Organizing, Staffing, Directing, Coordinating, Motivating, Controlling.

  • What are the Principles of Coordination? Explains

    Principles of Coordination; First. Some Discuss Coordination – The effectiveness of a system relates to its ability to fulfill its functional requirements. When a system consists of a set of collaborating agents, the overall performance may depend more on their ability to work together than on optimizing individual behavior. The goal of an agent is often at odds with the interest of the collective. The limitations of centralized control for complex systems suggest the need for decentralized coordination. This can achieve by having each agent take explicit account of the cost of engaging in an activity as well as a measure of reward for competent behavior.

    Here are Explains, What are the Principles of Coordination? 10 types of Principles.

    The consideration of payoffs and penalties leads to an economic perspective of multi-agent systems. In consequence, it is possible to draw on previous work in diverse fields, ranging from game theory to welfare economics and social policy. The promise and limitations of the explicit valuation approach examine. To illustrate, the behavior of collaborative systems can interpret in terms of games of strategy; this approach permits a better understanding of the conditions for globally optimal behavior, as well as strategies for their attainment. The notions of agents and the explicit valuation of action are versatile concepts. One indication of the versatility lies in the fact that these concepts cover as a special case the idea of genetic algorithms as a mechanism for learning systems.

    Now, Here are Principles of Coordination;

    Simplified organization:

    Authority, responsibility, duty, and other job descriptions should clearly describe by the organization. Also, Coordination may be simple and easy when all duties and power simplify.

    Harmonized programs and policies:

    An organization must set the programs and policies. These programs and policies must harmonize. Harmonized policies help to make coordination effective.

    Well, the designed system of communication:

    Without effective communication coordination and harmonizing activities is not possible. Therefore, the communication system must well design.

    Voluntary cooperation:

    Are voluntarily cooperated when all behave voluntarily cooperated, then only coordination can be successful.

    Coordination through supervision:

    Supervisors are the most important actor to coordinate the workers and their work. Mainly in all organization supervisors coordinate the resources and activities.

    Continuity:

    It is a never-ending process. When it is done continuously, the resources are not used effectively and they cannot contribute.

    Direct contact:

    Direct contact is necessary for effective coordination. Face to face contact may provide more effectiveness. Direct personal contact removes misunderstanding and conflict between departments or between personnel. It involves direct face to face communication, personal discussion, settlement of differences, exchanges of ideas between the personnel.

    Clearly defined goals:

    Organizational goals and other departmental goals must clearly define otherwise it isn’t easy to coordinate the resources and activities.

    Effective leadership:

    Leadership must be effective. As well as, It helps o increase the confidence of employees and it develops the morale of workers. Also, Effective leadership helps ineffective coordination.

    Continuous Process:

    Coordination is a continuous process and must go on all the time. In contrast to the principle of continuity, the difference of opinions and information gap may appear and misunderstanding in interdepartmental operations may crop up in the absence of coordination. By keeping the process of coordination as a continuous flow of information, sound coordination can be ensured in an enterprise.

    Notes: Here are you have read it Principles of Coordination. And, Maybe You will read it; The definitions of all the Seven Processes of Scientific Management; Planning, Organizing, Staffing, Directing, Coordinating, Motivating, Controlling. You will be reading this post about; What are the Functions of the Organization. Do you read it What is a Management and Organization?, Next Notes of Article Importance with Techniques of Coordination.

  • Coordinating Definition Examples Advantages

    Coordinating Definition Examples Advantages

    Coordinating is a horizontal function. It creates linkages between different verticals. Coordination is a choice whereas directing is a compulsion of the job.

    Processes of Scientific Management Coordinating

    All the activities divided group-wise or section-wise under organizing function. Now, such grouped activities coordinated towards the accomplishment of organizational objectives and goals. The difficulty of coordination depends upon the size of the organization. It increases with the increasing size of the organization.

    According to Knootz and O’Donell, “The last coordination occurs when individuals see how their jobs contribute to the dominant goals of the enterprise. This implies knowledge and understanding of enterprise objectives”.

    Coordination is the management of interdependence in work situations. It is the orderly synchronization or fitting together of the interdependent efforts of individuals. For example, in a hospital, the activities of doctors, nurses, ward attendants, and lab technicians must properly synchronized if the patient is to receive good care.

    Similarly, in a modern enterprise, which consists of a number of departments, such as production, purchase, sales, finance, personnel etc., there is a need for all of them to properly time their interdependent activities and to effectively reunite the subdivided work. To coordinate is to keep expenditure proportional to financial resources; equipment and tools to production needs; stocks to the rate of consumption; sales to production. It is to build the house neither too big nor too small; adapt the tool to its use; the road to the vehicle; the safety precaution to the risks.

    In a well-coordinated enterprise, the following facts observed

    • Each department works in harmony with the rest. Stores know what has to supplied and at what time; production knows its target; maintenance keeps equipment and tools in good order.
    • Each department, division, and subdivision is precisely informed about the share it must take in the common task.
    • The working schedule of the various departments is constantly tuned to the circumstances.

    The example of the process: Coordinating is a horizontal function. It creates linkages between different verticals. Coordination is a choice whereas directing is a compulsion of the job. Not many people like to coordinate the activities between various sections. It involves talking to persons across the line to get certain things done. It creates linkages between dissimilar functions, It unifies the work of one section with some other section.

    Meaning and Definition

    Coordination refers to the process of organizing people or groups so that they work together properly and efficiently. It involves aligning and synchronizing the activities of different sections or departments to achieve the overall objectives of the organization.

    Definition: According to Knootz and O’Donnell, “The last coordination occurs when individuals see how their jobs contribute to the dominant goals of the enterprise. This implies knowledge and understanding of enterprise objectives.”

    Examples

    • Healthcare: In a hospital, the coordination between doctors, nurses, ward attendants, and lab technicians ensures that patients receive timely and comprehensive care.
    • Manufacturing: Coordination between the production, purchasing, sales, and maintenance departments ensures smooth operations and timely delivery of products.

    Importance

    1. Efficiency: Proper coordination improves operational efficiency by ensuring that different parts of the organization work together seamlessly.
    2. Resource Utilization: It helps in the optimal utilization of resources by avoiding duplication of work and reducing wastage.
    3. Goal Achievement: Coordination aligns the activities of various departments with the overall goals of the organization, making it easier to achieve these goals.
    4. Conflict Reduction: Provides clarity of roles and responsibilities, thus reducing misunderstandings and conflicts between departments.
    5. Adaptability: Enhances the organization’s ability to adapt to changes and uncertainties in the business environment.

    Advantages

    1. Improved Performance: Coordinated efforts lead to better performance as the collective efforts are aligned with the goals.
    2. Enhanced Communication: Facilitates better communication among different departments, leading to a clearer understanding of tasks and responsibilities.
    3. Synergy: Creates synergy by combining the strengths of different departments and making the whole greater than the sum of its parts.
    4. Flexibility: Increases the organization’s ability to respond to changes quickly and efficiently.
    5. Employee Morale: Boosts employee morale as everyone understands their role and how it contributes to the organization’s success.

    Disadvantages

    1. Complexity: The need for coordination increases with the size and complexity of the organization, making it a challenging task.
    2. Time-Consuming: Effective coordination requires time and effort, which can be resource-intensive.
    3. Resistance to Change: Employees or departments may resist changes that are necessary for better coordination.
    4. Cost: Implementing coordination mechanisms, such as meetings, software tools, and communication systems, can increase operational costs.
    5. Over-Reliance: Too much focus on coordination can lead to over-reliance on structure, potentially stifling creativity and innovation.

    By understanding and implementing effective coordination, organizations can enhance efficiency, achieve their objectives, and foster a harmonious working environment. Nonetheless, it is crucial to acknowledge and address the potential challenges to maintain a balanced approach.

    Notes: You will come to know the definitions of all the seven Processes of Scientific Management; Planning, Organizing, Staffing, Directing, Coordinating, Motivating, Controlling.