Tag: Organizational

Organizational!

An organization or organisation is an entity comprising multiple people, such as an institution or an association. That has a collective goal and is the link to an external environment. Organizational, relating to an organization or the way it is set-up, the action of organizing something.

There are a variety of legal types of organizations, including corporations, governments, non-governmental organizations, political organizations, international organizations, arm forces, charities, not-for-profit corporations, partnerships, cooperatives, and educational institutions. A hybrid organization is a body that operates in both the public sector and the private sector simultaneously, fulfilling public duties and developing commercial market activities.

A voluntary association is an organization consisting of volunteers. Such organizations may be able to operate without legal formalities, depending on jurisdiction, including informal clubs. Organizations may also operate in secret and/or illegally in the case of secret societies, criminal organizations and resistance movements.

Organizational - ilearnlot

  • Organizational Development (OD) concept elements benefits

    Organizational Development (OD) concept elements benefits

    Explore the essential concepts of Organizational Development (OD), including key elements, processes, and emerging trends. Learn how OD enhances organizational effectiveness, fosters innovation, and aligns strategies with goals to navigate the complexities of today’s business environment.

    What is the Organizational Development (OD)?

    Organizational Development (OD) is a systematic, planned process aimed at improving an organization’s effectiveness, adaptability, and capacity to achieve its goals. Rooted in behavioral science, OD focuses on aligning strategies, structures, processes, and culture with the organization’s mission and external environment. Below is a comprehensive overview that delves deeper into each aspect of OD.

    Meaning and definition

    Organizational Development (OD) is a deliberate, systematic approach to improving the overall health and effectiveness of an organization through planned change. It involves aligning strategy, structure, people, and processes to enable an organization to adapt to changes in the environment, enhance performance, and achieve its goals.

    OD utilizes theories and principles from various fields, including psychology, sociology, and management, to facilitate the development of a positive organizational culture and improve employee engagement, learning, and collaboration.

    Key Elements of Organizational Development

    Change Management

    Change is inevitable in any organization. Effective change management involves understanding the dynamics of change, anticipating resistance, and enabling a smooth transition. It’s essential to communicate the reasons for change clearly to all stakeholders and provide support throughout the process. Tools like Lewin’s Change Model (Unfreeze-Change-Refreeze) and Kotter’s 8-Step Process emphasize the importance of not just making changes but ensuring they stick.

    Strategies: Develop a communication plan, engage stakeholders early, and incorporate feedback loops to address concerns.

    Leadership Development

    A robust leadership development program is crucial for cultivating effective leaders who can inspire teams and drive organizational goals. This includes tailored leadership training, workshops focused on soft skills, and creating mentorship opportunities for emerging leaders.

    Programs: Leadership boot camps, executive coaching, and continuous feedback mechanisms.

    Culture Transformation

    Organizational culture directly influences employee behavior and overall performance. Transforming culture requires a strong vision and commitment from leadership, along with continuous education and reinforcement of desired behaviors.

    Approaches: Conduct cultural assessments, engage employees in co-creating cultural values, and celebrate cultural successes.

    Team Effectiveness

    High-performing teams are the backbone of successful organizations. Fostering an environment of trust and collaboration helps teams achieve their goals and enhances innovation.

    Activities: Team-building retreats, regular feedback sessions, and diversity initiatives to foster a sense of belonging.

    Process Improvement

    Efficient processes lead to better performance and customer satisfaction. Using methodologies like Lean, Six Sigma, or Agile allows organizations to minimize waste and optimize resources.

    Techniques: Value stream mapping, Kaizen events, and regular process audits.

    Employee Engagement

    Engaged employees are more productive and committed to their organization. Creating a culture of recognition and support can significantly improve engagement levels.

    Methods: Regular surveys, recognition programs, career development opportunities, and a focus on employee well-being.

    OD Frameworks and Models

    • Action Research Model: This model emphasizes a reflective process that allows organizations to identify problems, develop strategies, implement changes, and assess their effectiveness in a continuous loop.
    • Systems Theory: This holistic perspective views the organization as an interconnected system, emphasizing that changes in one area can significantly impact others, underscoring the importance of a coordinated approach to OD efforts.
    • Appreciative Inquiry: This approach focuses on what is working well in an organization, rather than solely on problems. The 4-D Cycle (Discover, Dream, Design, Deliver) encourages collective imagination and empowers employees to envision a positive future.
    • McKinsey 7S Model: This model identifies seven essential elements (Strategy, Structure, Systems, Shared Values, Skills, Style, and Staff) that need to be aligned for effective organizational performance.

    OD Process Steps

    1. Diagnosis: A thorough diagnosis involves collecting data through surveys, interviews, focus groups, and SWOT analysis. Identifying performance gaps, cultural issues, and challenges provides a foundation for strategic planning.
    2. Planning: Establishing clear, measurable objectives is critical. This step involves designing interventions based on diagnosis, which should be tailored to the specific needs of the organization, ensuring buy-in from stakeholders.
    3. Intervention: Interventions may include workshops, training sessions, restructuring efforts, or technology implementation. Careful attention must be given to the targeted outcomes and the needs of the employees involved.
    4. Evaluation: After implementing changes, organizations should measure the effectiveness of interventions through various performance indicators such as employee satisfaction, productivity levels, and qualitative feedback. Regular evaluations help identify lessons learned and necessary adjustments.

    Examples of OD Interventions

    • Corporate Restructuring: Implementation of new organizational hierarchies or departments to enhance efficiency and responsiveness to market demands.
    • Mergers & Acquisitions: Managing the integration process by aligning cultures and systems, addressing employee concerns, and ensuring seamless operations post-merger.
    • Digital Transformation: Adopting advanced technologies that require upskilling employees to leverage new systems effectively.
    • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Initiatives: Creating and enforcing policies that foster a diverse workforce and ensure equitable treatment for all employees.

    Theories Informing OD

    1. Humanistic Psychology (Maslow, McGregor): Emphasizes the importance of understanding employee needs and motivations. The Theory Y management style promotes a positive view of employees as self-motivated and capable of growth.
    2. Open Systems Theory: This theory posits that organizations must be viewed within the context of their broader environment, acknowledging that they continuously adapt and evolve based on external pressures such as competition, regulations, and societal changes.
    3. Complexity Theory: Recognizes organizations as complex adaptive systems that thrive on interdependence and dynamic interactions. Embracing complexity fosters innovative outcomes in unpredictable challenges.

    Challenges in OD

    • Resistance to Change: Employees or leadership may resist adopting new processes or systems, stemming from fear of the unknown or concern about their roles. Effective communication and involvement can mitigate this resistance.
    • Cultural Misalignment: When a new strategy conflicts with an existing culture, it creates barriers to successful implementation. Identifying cultural values and engaging leaders in promoting desired changes is essential.
    • Sustainability: Ensuring that changes remain effective requires continual reinforcement and adjustment based on feedback and changing conditions.
    • Measuring ROI: Quantifying the results of OD efforts can be challenging, particularly for intangible outcomes like morale or innovation, which require qualitative assessments in conjunction with quantitative metrics.
    1. Agile OD: With the increasing pace of change in business environments, organizations are adopting agile methodologies that facilitate rapid, iterative development of processes and structures.
    2. Remote/Hybrid Work: The shift towards remote work environments necessitates new strategies for maintaining engagement, productivity, and connection among dispersed teams.
    3. Focus on Well-being: Organizations are beginning to recognize the importance of mental health and well-being, creating programs that prioritize employees’ emotional and physical health.
    4. Data-Driven OD: Utilizing data analytics to inform decisions about organizational changes, understand employee sentiments, and track progress enhances the effectiveness of OD initiatives.

    Why OD Matters

    In a rapidly changing world, organizations must adapt to survive. OD equips them to:

    • Respond to market disruptions (e.g., technological advancements, global competition).
    • Foster an environment that encourages innovation, creativity, and resilience against challenges.
    • Attract, retain, and develop talent by providing a positive and fulfilling work experience.
    • Align internal operations and culture with societal expectations regarding sustainability, ethical practices, and corporate governance.

    Features of OD

    1. Systematic Approach: OD employs a structured framework for planning and implementing changes within an organization to enhance effectiveness.
    2. Focus on Culture and Behavior: Emphasizes the importance of organizational culture and employee behavior in driving change and achieving goals.
    3. Continuous Learning: Encourages a culture of ongoing learning and development to adapt to changes in the environment.
    4. Collaborative Process: Involves collaboration among stakeholders, including leadership, employees, and teams, for successful implementation.
    5. Data-Driven Decision Making: Utilizes data and analytics to inform decisions, assess needs, and measure outcomes of interventions.
    6. Adaptability: Acknowledges that organizations must be flexible and responsive to changes in the business environment and encourages agile methodologies.

    Objectives of OD

    1. Enhance Organizational Effectiveness: Improve the overall performance and efficiency of the organization.
    2. Facilitate Change Management: Equip organizations with the tools and strategies needed to manage and adapt to changes effectively.
    3. Foster Employee Engagement: Develop initiatives that improve employee satisfaction, motivation, and commitment to the organization.
    4. Support Leadership Development: Create leaders who can inspire, engage, and manage teams effectively while driving organizational goals.
    5. Align Strategy and Culture: Ensure that the organization’s culture supports its strategic objectives and enhances overall performance.
    6. Promote Innovation: Encourage creativity and the adoption of new ideas to remain competitive in the marketplace.

    Benefits of OD

    1. Increased Productivity: Improved processes and employee engagement lead to higher productivity levels across the organization.
    2. Enhanced Employee Satisfaction: A positive organizational culture and supportive environment contribute to higher employee morale and retention.
    3. Improved Communication: OD initiatives often focus on open communication channels, fostering better collaboration and information sharing.
    4. Greater Agility: Organizations that effectively implement OD can quickly adapt to market changes and emerging trends.
    5. Sustainable Growth: A focus on continuous improvement and development helps organizations achieve long-term growth and resilience.
    6. Stronger Leadership: Effective OD programs cultivate strong leaders who can navigate challenges and influence positive change within the organization.
    7. Diversified Perspectives: Encouraging diversity and inclusion in OD efforts leads to richer perspectives and innovative solutions.
    8. Better Alignment with Market Demands: OD helps organizations align their strategies with evolving market needs, ensuring relevance and competitiveness.

    Case Studies

    • Toyota: Known for its commitment to Lean manufacturing, Toyota effectively transformed its operations and culture, enabling it to become a leader in the automotive industry.
    • Google: Fostered a culture of innovation and risk-taking by prioritizing psychological safety and open communication, which led to groundbreaking developments and employee satisfaction.
    • Procter & Gamble: Used OD principles to shift from traditional hierarchical structures to a more collaborative approach, enhancing agility and responsiveness in the marketplace.

    Organizational Development is not a one-time fix but an ongoing journey. By prioritizing people, processes, and purpose, OD helps organizations thrive amid complexity, fostering a culture of continuous improvement while creating value for both stakeholders and society. In a time when adaptability is critical, organizations that invest in OD are likely to achieve sustainable success and maintain a competitive edge in their respective industries.

    FAQs

    1. What is Organizational Development (OD)?

    OD is a systematic process focused on improving an organization’s effectiveness, adaptability, and capacity to achieve goals by aligning strategies, structures, processes, and culture.

    2. What are the key elements of OD?

    Key elements include Change Management, Leadership Development, Culture Transformation, Team Effectiveness, Process Improvement, and Employee Engagement.

    3. What frameworks inform OD?

    Popular models include Action Research, Systems Theory, Appreciative Inquiry, and the McKinsey 7S Model.

    4. What are the steps in the OD process?

    The OD process typically involves Diagnosis, Planning, Intervention, and Evaluation.

    5. What are some common OD interventions?

    Interventions can include Corporate Restructuring, Mergers & Acquisitions, Digital Transformation, and DEI Initiatives.

    6. What challenges does OD face?

    Challenges include Resistance to Change, Cultural Misalignment, ensuring sustainability, and measuring ROI.

    7. What are emerging trends in OD?

    Trends include Agile OD methodologies, Remote/Hybrid Work strategies, a focus on Employee Well-being, and Data-Driven OD.

    8. Why does OD matter?

    OD helps organizations adapt to change, foster innovation, attract talent, and align operations with societal expectations.

    9. What are the objectives of OD?

    Objectives include enhancing effectiveness, facilitating change management, fostering engagement, supporting leadership development, and promoting innovation.

    10. What are the benefits of OD?

    Benefits include increased productivity, enhanced employee satisfaction, improved communication, greater agility, and sustainable growth.

    11. Can you provide examples of successful OD?

    Examples include Toyota’s Lean manufacturing approach, Google’s culture of innovation, and Procter & Gamble’s collaborative strategy shift.

  • What is data driven organizational change?

    What is data driven organizational change?

    Data-driven organizational change leverages analytics and insights to transform decision-making and culture within businesses. Discover its key characteristics, importance, implementation steps, challenges, and benefits for achieving long-term growth.

    Explain; what is data driven organizational change?

    Data-driven organizational change refers to the process of using data analytics, insights, and evidence to guide decision-making, strategy, and cultural shifts within a business. It involves restructuring processes, behaviors, and systems to prioritize data over intuition or tradition, enabling organizations to adapt more effectively to market demands, improve efficiency, and innovate.

    Key Characteristics of Data-Driven Change

    1. Evidence-Based Decisions: Replacing “gut feelings” with actionable insights derived from data.
    2. Cultural Shift: Fostering a mindset where employees at all levels trust and leverage data.
    3. Process Optimization: Redesigning workflows based on performance metrics and analytics.
    4. Technology Integration: Adopting tools (e.g., BI platforms, AI/ML) to collect, analyze, and visualize data.
    5. Continuous Improvement: Using real-time feedback loops to refine strategies and operations.

    Why It Matters

    • Competitive Advantage: Companies like Amazon, Netflix, and Google use data to outpace competitors.
    • Risk Mitigation: Data identifies inefficiencies, market shifts, and customer churn early.
    • Agility: Enables rapid responses to trends, crises, or opportunities.
    • Customer-Centricity: Personalizes experiences by analyzing behavior, preferences, and feedback.

    Steps to Implement Data-Driven Change

    1. Define Clear Objectives
      Align data initiatives with business goals (e.g., “Reduce operational costs by 15%” or “Increase customer retention”).
    2. Break Down Data Silos
      Integrate fragmented data sources (e.g., CRM, ERP, surveys) into a centralized system for a unified view.
    3. Invest in Tools & Skills
      • Deploy analytics platforms (Tableau, Power BI, Snowflake).
      • Train employees in data literacy, SQL, or visualization tools.
      • Hire roles like data scientists, analysts, or CDOs (Chief Data Officers).
    4. Establish Data Governance
      Ensure data quality, security, and compliance (e.g., GDPR) through policies and oversight.
    5. Pilot Small-Scale Projects
      Test hypotheses with specific teams (e.g., marketing A/B tests) before scaling company-wide.
    6. Foster a Data Culture
      • Encourage curiosity: Reward employees who ask, “What does the data say?
      • Share insights transparently across departments.
      • Use dashboards to make data accessible to non-technical teams.
    7. Iterate and Scale
      Monitor KPIs, learn from failures, and refine strategies continuously.

    Examples of Data-Driven Change

    1. Netflix: Uses viewer data to guide content creation, recommendations, and marketing.
    2. Walmart: Analyzes sales and inventory data to optimize supply chains and pricing.
    3. Spotify: Leverages user listening habits to curate playlists and negotiate licensing deals.
    4. Healthcare: Hospitals use patient data to reduce wait times and improve treatment outcomes.

    Challenges

    • Resistance to Change: Employees may cling to legacy processes or distrust data.
    • Data Quality: Poor or incomplete data leads to flawed insights.
    • Over-Reliance on Data: Ignoring qualitative factors (e.g., employee morale, brand reputation).
    • Costs: Upfront investments in tools, training, and infrastructure.

    Benefits of Success

    • Improved Decision-Making: Faster, more accurate choices across all levels.
    • Innovation: Data uncovers new opportunities (e.g., untapped markets, product features).
    • Efficiency: Automates repetitive tasks and identifies waste.
    • Customer Satisfaction: Delivers hyper-personalized experiences.

    Key Takeaways

    Data-driven organizational change is not just about technology—it requires cultural buy-in, leadership support, and a willingness to experiment. Companies that succeed in this transformation become more resilient, adaptive, and customer-focused, positioning themselves for long-term growth in a data-centric world.

    Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

    1. What is data-driven organizational change?

    Data-driven organizational change refers to the process of utilizing data and analytics to inform decision-making, shape strategies, and drive cultural transformations within an organization. It prioritizes evidence over intuition, allowing businesses to respond more effectively to market dynamics.

    2. Why is data-driven change important?

    Data-driven change is crucial because it enables organizations to gain a competitive advantage, mitigate risks, enhance agility, and foster customer-centricity. By leveraging data, companies can make informed decisions that lead to better outcomes and long-term growth.

    3. What are the key characteristics of data-driven change?

    Key characteristics include evidence-based decision-making, a cultural shift towards data trust, process optimization based on analytics, technology integration for data management, and a focus on continuous improvement through real-time insights.

    4. What steps should organizations take to implement data-driven change?

    Organizations should:

    1. Define clear objectives aligned with business goals.
    2. Break down data silos for a unified view.
    3. Invest in tools and skills for data analytics.
    4. Establish data governance for quality and compliance.
    5. Pilot small-scale projects before full implementation.
    6. Foster a data culture throughout the organization.
    7. Monitor, iterate, and scale successful initiatives.

    5. What challenges may arise during data-driven change?

    Challenges include resistance to change from employees, data quality issues, the risk of over-relying on data while ignoring qualitative factors, and the costs associated with implementing new tools and training.

    6. What benefits can be expected from successful data-driven change?

    Benefits include improved decision-making, increased innovation, greater operational efficiency, and enhanced customer satisfaction through personalized experiences.

    7. How can companies encourage a data-driven culture?

    To foster a data-driven culture, organizations can reward curiosity, share insights transparently, and make data accessible through dashboards and other visualization tools. Encouraging open discussions about data findings can also help build trust in data across teams.

  • 10 Key Dimensions of Organizational Culture

    10 Key Dimensions of Organizational Culture

    Explore the key dimensions of organizational culture and their impact on employee engagement, satisfaction, and productivity. Organizational culture encompasses the collective values, beliefs, and behaviors that establish how work is conducted within an organization. This blog post explores the definition of organizational culture, its significance in employee engagement and satisfaction, key dimensions that influence it, and effective methods for assessing and evolving workplace culture. Discover how strong cultural foundations enhance productivity and foster a positive work environment, ultimately driving organizational success.

    Definition of Organizational Culture

    Organizational culture refers to the collective values, beliefs, and behaviors that characterize an organization and influence how work is conducted within it. This culture serves as a guiding framework for decision-making, communication, and interpersonal relationships among employees, ensuring they are aligned with the organization’s objectives and goals. It manifests in various forms, including company policies, rituals, norms, and even the physical environment in which employees operate.

    Understanding the significance of organizational culture is crucial, as it directly impacts employee engagement and satisfaction. A strong organizational culture fosters a sense of belonging and commitment among employees, encouraging them to invest emotionally and intellectually in their roles. When individuals resonate with the underlying values and mission of the organization, they are more likely to demonstrate higher levels of productivity and creativity. Conversely, a weak or misaligned culture can lead to disengagement, increased turnover rates, and diminished overall performance.

    Moreover, organizational culture plays a vital role in shaping external perceptions of the company. Organizations with a positive and robust culture are often more attractive to potential employees and clients, which can enhance their reputation in the marketplace. This cultural foundation influences not only internal operations but also how stakeholders, including customers and partners, perceive the organization. As such, fostering an environment where the core values not only articulated but also lived by every member can catalyze significant improvements in both employee morale and organizational effectiveness.

    In summary, the definition of organizational culture encompasses a system of shared values and practices that fundamentally shape daily work life. Its significance extends beyond employee satisfaction, permeating operational efficiency and external branding, thereby making it an essential element for any organization striving for success.

    Key Dimensions of Organizational Culture

    Understanding the key dimensions of organizational culture is essential for creating a cohesive and productive workplace environment. These dimensions provide a framework for evaluating the distinct attributes that define an organization’s culture:

    1. Values

    Values are the core principles or standards that guide the behavior and decision-making processes within an organization. They serve as the foundation for the organization’s actions and often reflected in its mission and vision statements.

    2. Norms

    Norms are the unwritten rules and expectations about how members of the organization should behave. These norms influence everyday interactions and can dictate dress codes, communication styles, and work ethics.

    3. Symbols

    Symbols include logos, slogans, and other visual elements that represent the organization’s identity. These symbols communicate the organization’s values and culture both internally and externally.

    4. Rituals and Ceremonies

    Rituals and ceremonies are formal practices or events that commemorate significant achievements or milestones within the organization. They reinforce the culture by celebrating shared accomplishments and fostering a sense of community.

    5. Stories

    Stories are narratives shared within the organization that convey its history, values, and significant events. These anecdotes help to build a collective identity and illustrate how the organization’s values lived out in practice.

    6. Leadership Style

    The approach and behavior of leaders greatly influence the organizational culture. Leaders who are charismatic, transformational, or participative can shape the culture by setting examples and fostering specific behaviors among employees.

    7. Communication Patterns

    Communication patterns refer to the ways in which information flows within the organization. This includes formal communication channels, such as emails and meetings, as well as informal interactions. Open and transparent communication helps in building trust and collaboration.

    8. Decision-Making Processes

    The manner in which decisions are made within an organization can reflect and shape its culture. Whether decisions are made collectively or unilaterally, and whether they based on data or intuition, reveals much about the organization’s priorities and values.

    9. Rewards and Recognition

    The systems in place to reward and recognize employees for their contributions are critical in shaping organizational culture. Effective recognition programs can reinforce desired behaviors and motivate employees to align with cultural expectations.

    10. Work Environment

    The physical setting in which employees work, including office layout, amenities, and remote work policies, plays a role in shaping organizational culture. A conducive work environment can enhance productivity, creativity, and employee satisfaction.

    In summary, these dimensions provide a comprehensive lens through which the intricate fabric of any organizational culture can be understood, analyzed, and improved. By focusing on these key areas, organizations can create a culture that aligns with their strategic objectives and inspires their workforce.

    Assessing and Measuring Organizational Culture

    Understanding and measuring organizational culture is essential for fostering a conducive work environment. Various methods exist to assess culture, each with its unique strengths and applications. Surveys are among the most common tools used to evaluate organizational culture. These questionnaires can be designed to gather quantitative and qualitative data from employees about their perceptions and experiences. By employing a structured format, organizations can identify patterns and gauge the overall cultural sentiment within their workforce.

    In addition to surveys, conducting interviews can provide deeper insights into an organization’s culture. One-on-one or group interviews allow employees to express their opinions in a more open-ended format, often revealing nuances that surveys may overlook. This qualitative approach can help leaders understand the underlying values and beliefs that drive employee behavior and attitudes toward their work environment.

    Cultural audits represent another effective method for measuring organizational culture. This systematic examination involves assessing various elements of the organization, such as policies, practices, and employee interactions. By analyzing these factors, organizations can pinpoint discrepancies between desired cultural attributes and the actual culture present. This method not only highlights strengths but also identifies areas requiring improvement.

    Measuring organizational culture is vital as it equips businesses with the insights needed to drive meaningful change. Organizations that understand their culture can leverage this knowledge to enhance employee engagement, productivity, and retention. Moreover, identifying cultural strengths and weaknesses enables leadership to develop targeted strategies that address specific challenges, ultimately transforming the culture into a competitive advantage.

    To successfully conduct cultural assessments, it is crucial to adopt a systematic approach to data interpretation. Analyzing and synthesizing findings from various methods allows organizations to construct a comprehensive picture of their culture. This holistic view aids in crafting actionable strategies to evolve the organizational culture in alignment with broader business objectives.

    Shaping and Evolving Organizational Culture

    Organizational culture is not static; it continually evolves as an organization adapts to internal and external forces. Shaping and evolving this culture requires deliberate strategies and consistent efforts from leadership and employees alike. Central to this process is the role of leadership, which serves as a key driver of cultural transformation. Leaders must embody the values and behaviors they wish to instill within their teams, as employees often look to their superiors for guidance.

    To effectively influence organizational culture, it is crucial to ensure alignment between espoused values—what an organization claims to value—and actual behaviors demonstrated within the workplace. This alignment fosters a sense of authenticity and builds trust among employees. Organizations should conduct regular assessments to identify discrepancies between stated cultural values and observed behaviors, allowing them to make necessary adjustments. Providing constructive feedback and recognizing individuals who exemplify these values can also strengthen this alignment.

    An inclusive environment is fundamental for a thriving organizational culture. This not only enhances employee engagement but also encourages diverse perspectives, fostering innovation. Organizations can promote inclusivity by implementing diversity training, creating employee resource groups, and ensuring that all voices are heard during decision-making processes. These initiatives can help cultivate a sense of belonging, which is essential for both individual and organizational success.

    Practically, organizations can take several actionable steps to enhance their culture. Establishing regular communication channels to share cultural expectations, offering mentorship programs, and creating avenues for employee input can be effective. However, it’s also essential to recognize potential challenges during this evolution, such as resistance to change or lack of clear direction. By proactively addressing these challenges and being transparent about the culture-building process, organizations can foster a more adaptive and resilient workforce.

  • Functional Organizational Structure: How to be Know

    Functional Organizational Structure: How to be Know

    A functional organizational structure is a type of organizational arrangement where employees with similar skill sets and expertise are grouped based on their functions or specialized tasks. In this structure, different departments, such as finance, marketing, human resources, and operations, are formed to focus on specific areas of the organization’s operations. Each department is led by a manager who oversees the activities and performance of the employees within that functional area.

    The Essential Elements of a Successful Functional Organizational Structure

    This type of structure facilitates efficiency, clear reporting lines, and expertise development within specific functions. Also, It is commonly used in large organizations with a clear division of labor and distinctive functional areas.

    The Essential Elements of a Successful Functional Organizational Structure Image
    Photo by Pexels Cottonbro Studio

    Definition of Functional Organizational Structure

    A functional organizational structure is a framework for organizing and managing an organization based on specific functions or departments. In this structure, individuals with similar skills, expertise, or job roles are grouped within functional units such as finance, marketing, operations, human resources, and so on.

    In a functional organizational structure, each functional unit is typically headed by a manager or department head who is responsible for overseeing the activities, assigning tasks, and managing the performance of the employees within that specific function. Also, This structure allows for specialization, clear lines of authority, and a coordinated approach to achieving organizational goals.

    By organizing employees based on their functional expertise, the functional structure promotes efficiency, improves communication and coordination within departments, and enables the development and utilization of specialized skills and knowledge.

    Features and Characteristics of Functional Organizational Structure

    A functional organizational structure has several key characteristics that contribute to its effectiveness and efficiency:

    1. Departmentalization: The structure stands organized based on functional areas or departments, such as finance, marketing, operations, and human resources. Each department focuses on a specific aspect of the organization’s operations.
    2. Specialization: Employees with similar skill sets and expertise stand grouped within a specific department. This allows individuals to develop specialized knowledge and skills within their respective functions.
    3. Clear Reporting Lines: The structure provides clear lines of authority and reporting. Each department stands headed by a manager or department head who is responsible for overseeing the activities of the employees within that function.
    4. Efficiency: By grouping employees with similar expertise together, the functional structure promotes efficiency. It allows individuals to focus on their specific tasks and responsibilities, leading to increased productivity and effectiveness.
    5. Expertise Development: The functional structure encourages the development of expertise within specific functions. Employees have the opportunity to deepen their knowledge and skills, which can result in high-quality work and innovative solutions.
    6. Coordination: Despite the focus on individual functions, the functional structure emphasizes coordination between departments. By aligning their efforts toward common organizational goals, departments can work together smoothly and efficiently.
    7. Communication: The structure facilitates effective communication within departments. Employees can easily share knowledge and collaborate with colleagues who possess similar expertise, leading to improved decision-making and problem-solving.

    Overall, a functional organizational structure provides a clear framework for organizing employees based on their skills and functions, resulting in increased efficiency, specialization, and effective coordination within the organization.

    Pros and Advantages Vs Cons and Disadvantages of Functional Organizational Structure

    The functional organizational structure has several advantages and disadvantages. Let’s explore them:

    Pros and advantages:

    1. Efficiency: The functional structure groups employees with similar skills together, allowing them to focus on their specific tasks and responsibilities. This specialization promotes efficiency and can lead to increased productivity.
    2. Expertise Development: Employees within each functional area have the opportunity to develop specialized knowledge and skills. This can result in high-quality work and innovative solutions within their respective domains.
    3. Clear Reporting Lines: The functional structure provides clear lines of authority and reporting. Each department stands headed by a manager or department head who oversees the activities and performance of the employees within their functional area, ensuring accountability and efficient decision-making.
    4. Coordination: Despite the focus on individual functions, the functional structure emphasizes coordination between departments. By aligning their efforts toward common organizational goals, departments can work together smoothly and efficiently.
    5. Communication: The structure facilitates effective communication within departments. Employees can easily share knowledge and collaborate with colleagues who possess similar expertise, leading to improved decision-making and problem-solving.

    Cons and disadvantages:

    1. Departmental Silos: The functional structure can sometimes lead to departmental silos, where employees become overly focused on their functional area and may have limited interaction with other departments. This can hinder cross-functional collaboration and creativity.
    2. Lack of Flexibility: The functional structure may struggle to adapt quickly to changes in the external environment or shift organizational priorities. Decision-making and resource allocation can be slow and bureaucratic, potentially hindering responsiveness.
    3. Interdepartmental Conflict: As departments work independently within their functional areas, conflicts may arise when different departments have competing goals or priorities. This can lead to tensions and challenges in achieving overall organizational objectives.
    4. Limited Focus on Customers: The functional structure may prioritize functional efficiency over customer-centricity. Since employees primarily focus on their functional tasks, customer needs and experiences may not receive adequate attention, potentially impacting customer satisfaction.
    5. Communication Barriers: Despite promoting communication within departments, the functional structure may create communication barriers between different functional areas. Interdepartmental coordination and collaboration may require extra effort to overcome these barriers.

    They offer efficiency, expertise development, clear reporting lines, coordination, and communication. However, it can also lead to departmental silos, lack of flexibility, interdepartmental conflicts, limited customer focus, and communication barriers. Organizations should carefully consider these pros and cons when deciding on their organizational structure.

    Examples of Functional Organizational Structure

    Sure! Here are a few examples of functional organizational structures:

    1. Finance Department: In this structure, employees with expertise in finance, accounting, and financial analysis are grouped within the finance department. They handle financial planning, budgeting, and financial reporting for the organization.
    2. Marketing Department: In a functional organizational structure, the marketing department is responsible for promoting the organization’s products or services. It includes employees with skills in market research, advertising, brand management, and digital marketing.
    3. Human Resources Department: The HR department focuses on personnel management, recruitment, training and development, compensation and benefits, and employee relations. It consists of HR professionals who specialize in these areas.
    4. Operations Department: The operations department oversees the day-to-day operations of the organization. It includes employees who specialize in supply chain management, production, logistics, and quality control.
    5. Information Technology Department: In this functional structure, the IT department is responsible for managing and maintaining the organization’s technology infrastructure, systems, and networks. It includes IT professionals with expertise in areas such as software development, database management, and IT support.

    These are just a few examples of functional departments within an organization. Each department focuses on a specific area of expertise or function and is led by a department head or manager who oversees the activities and performance of the employees in that department.

    Bottom line

    A functional organizational structure is a type of arrangement where employees with similar expertise stand grouped based on their functions or specialized tasks. Different departments, such as finance, marketing, human resources, and operations, stand formed to focus on specific areas of the organization’s operations. Each department is led by a manager who supervises the employees within that functional area.

    This structure promotes efficiency, clear reporting lines, and expertise development within specific functions. It has features such as departmentalization, specialization, clear reporting lines, efficiency, expertise development, coordination, and communication. The pros of a functional organizational structure include efficiency, expertise development, clear reporting lines, coordination, and communication.

    However, there are also cons such as departmental silos, lack of flexibility, interdepartmental conflicts, limited customer focus, and communication barriers. Organizations should consider these pros and cons when deciding on their organizational structure. Examples of functional departments include finance, marketing, human resources, operations, and information technology.

  • What is Control and Organizational Factors? easy Explanation

    What is Control and Organizational Factors? easy Explanation

    Organizational Control: Control can define narrowly as the process a manager takes to assure that actual performance conforms to the organization’s plan, or more broadly as anything that regulates the process or activity of an organization. We are going to study of Control and Organizational Factors. First, want to know what they are? Simply put, organizational control is the process of assigning, evaluating, and regulating resources on an ongoing basis to accomplish an organization’s goals. To successfully control an organization, managers need to not only know what the performance standards are but also figure out how to share that information with employees.

    What is Control and Organizational Factors? easy Explanation.

    The behavioral implications of control, as elaborated above do not mean that control should not be applied in the organization. In fact, control has many positive aspects, as discussed earlier. The basic necessity is that it should suit die participants to make it more effective.

    Control and Organizational Factors - Topic
    Control and Organizational Factors – Topic

    From this point of view, it is imperative that various organizational phenomena should analyze, which affect the control system. Though there are many such organizational factors and people are engaged in finding out the answer to this basic question of how people can better control for organizational effectiveness, the main factors related directly to control are:

    Organizational Rules and Procedures:

    Most of the organizations prescribe some standing measures for providing guidelines for people’s actions in the organizations in the form of policies, rules, and procedures. While these elements provide guidelines to them, they, particularly rules and procedures, prescribe rigidity in action. Thus, they leave very little scope for freedom in action. These rules and procedures also take away initiative and generate alienation.

    Many times, they may not be able to isolate or sense the factors, which have caused a. particular situation. Thus, there may be a tendency to put the blame on those who are not really responsible for a situation. Besides, the rules and procedures create more delay in action and consequently the result. Such a phenomenon is more frustrating to individuals in the organization.

    Perception Formation:

    The people’s perception is affecting by a number of factors, as discussed earlier. In organizational situation, it is affected by the action of management, and the type of relationship between management and employees. The perception of people towards control is a major factor in determining the response to it.

    Thus, if the perception of people about the control attempt is based on sound organizational climate, mutual trust and belief, there is more likelihood of getting a favorable and better response from them. On the other hand, if it is based on general distrust, fear and suspicion, there is always the people resist a possibility that control attempt.

    Organizational Communication:

    The organization has to design a communication network for carrying the control, information both downward and upward. Through the downward communication, a superior sends the information about what a subordinate is expected to do; the upward communication is used to get control information from the subordinates, that is, what they have done. Besides, these channels also serve other purposes.

    Thus, the organization depends to a large extent for exercising control through communication. If the communication system is not quite effective, it will affect the control system also, to that extent, in communicating what is expected from a subordinate and also how he is performing. Often communication blockade is a major source of confusion and frustration in the minds of the people and they resist control.

    What is Control and Organizational Factors easy Explanation
    What is Control and Organizational Factors? easy Explanation

    Motivational Dynamics:

    The control is affecting by the motivational dynamics of people and how the organization is going to satisfy the various needs of the people. The motivational dynamics have a twofold role in control.

    • First, how the various attempts at control are in time with the needs of the people. Ideally speaking, a control system should focus adequately on the needs of the participants and must suit them. It means the control system should be tailor-made and no universal because people differ. Thus, all people cannot satisfy the same system.
    • Second, the organization itself provides motivation or, Demotivation to the people to work. Human beings, being gregarious, seek to remain in the organization.

    Thus, many of his needs can satisfy by this phenomenon. However, since organization, as a Collectivity of people, has certain norms of behavior it becomes Demotivation for the people. If it is not in accordance with the people. Thus the organizational phenomenon of how people are motivating is a crucial factor in the control of the behavior of people in the organization.

    The various factors discussed above suggest that. They actually decide the behavioral implications of control rather than the individual factors alone. Thus real implications may understand in terms of the interaction of individual and organizational factors. While many of the individual factors may analyze the lines suggested earlier in the previous part of the text. The organizational factors may analyze throughout the remaining portion of this part.

  • Organisational Behaviour: Elements, Nature, and Importance

    Organisational Behaviour: Elements, Nature, and Importance

    Organisational behaviour is generally confused with organisational theory, organisational psychology, and human resource management. This article also explains their Elements, Nature, and Importance. Organisational psychology restricts itself to psychological factors only whereas organizational behavior considers and combines all the branches of study e.g. Science, technology, economics, anthropology, psychology, and so on.

    Organisational Behaviour: Elements, Nature, Need, and Importance.

    It is the basis of human resource management and development. The former is concept-oriented whereas the latter is concerned with the technology of human development. The variables influencing human development are scientifically studied under organisational behaviour.

    Elements of Organisational Behaviour:

    The key elements in organisational behaviour are people, structure, technology, and the environment in which the organization operates.

    1. People: People make up the internal and social systems of the organization. They consist of individuals and groups. Groups are dynamic and they work in the organization to achieve their objectives.
    2. Structure: Structure defines the formal relationships of the people in organizations.
    3. Technology: Technology such as machines and work processes provide the resources with which people work and affect the tasks that they perform.
    4. Environment: All organizations operate within an external environment.

    Nature of Organisational Behaviour:

    Organisational behaviour in the study of human behavior in organizations. Whenever an individual joins an organization he brings with him a unique set of personal characteristics, experiences from other organizations, and a personal background.

    • At the first stage, organizational behavior must look at the unique perspective that each individual brings to the work setting.
    • In the second stage, organizational behavior is to study the dynamics of how incoming individuals interact with the broader organization. No individual can work in isolation.

    He comes into contact with other individuals and the organization in a variety of ways. The individual who joins a new organization has to come into contact with the co-workers, managers, formal policies and procedures of the organization, etc.

    Each individual brings to an organization a unique set of personal characteristics, experiences from other organizations, the environment surrounding the organization and they also possess a personal background. In considering the people working in an organization, organizational behavior must look at the unique perspective that each individual brings to the work setting. But individuals do not work in isolation.

    They come in contact with other individuals and the organization in a variety of ways. Points of contact include managers, co-workers, formal policies and procedures of the organization, and various changes implemented by the organization. Over time, the individual, too, changes, as a function of both the personal experiences and the organization. The organization is also affected by the presence and eventual absence of the individual.

    The study of organisational behaviour must consider how the individual and the organization interact. An organization, characteristically, exists before a particular person joins it and continues to exist after he leaves it. Thus, the organization itself represents a crucial third perspective from which to view organizational behavior.

    Why Need for studying Organisational Behaviour?

    The rules of work are different from the rules of play. The uniqueness of rules and the environment of organizations forces managers to study organisational behaviour to learn about normal and abnormal ranges of behavior.

    Organizational behavior is essentially an interdisciplinary approach to study human behavior at work. It tries to integrate the relevant knowledge drawn from related disciplines like psychology, sociology, and anthropology to make them applicable for studying and analyzing organizational behavior.

    Purposes of Organisational Behaviour:

    More specifically, organisational behaviour serves three purposes:

    1. What causes behaviour?
    2. Why particular antecedents cause behaviour?
    3. Which antecedents of behaviour can be controlled directly and which are beyond the control?

    A more specific and formal course in organizational behavior helps an individual to develop more refined and workable sets of the assumption that is directly relevant to his work interactions. Organizational behavior helps in predicting human behavior in the organizational setting by drawing a clear distinction between individual behavior and group behavior.

    They do not provide solutions to all complex and different behavior puzzles of organizations. It is only the intelligent judgment of the manager in dealing with a specific issue that can try to solve the problem.

    They only assist in making judgments that are derived from tenable assumptions; a judgment that takes into account the important variables underlying the situation; the judgment that is assigned due recognition to the complexity of individual or group behavior; the judgment that explicitly takes into account the managers own goals, motives, hang-ups, blind spots, and weaknesses.

    Organisational Behaviour Elements Nature and Importance
    Organisational Behaviour; Elements, Nature, and Importance, #Pixabay.

    Importance of Organisational Behaviour:

    Organisational behaviour is the analysis of an organization’s structure, func­tions, and the behavior of its people. The behavioral study encompasses both groups as well as individuals. It is an interdisciplinary field and has its roots in sociology and psychology. Organizational behavior is based on sociol­ogy, as the word organization itself represents social collectivity. It is linked to psychology because the subject encompasses the study of people, individu­ally and in groups at the workplace (essentially, an organization).

    Individual and group behaviour is again the function of many factors, which extend to other interdisciplinary fields such as economics, political science, social an­thropology, engineering, and human resource management. The scope of organizational behavior is therefore extensive. An organization needs to manage all these aspects so that it can sustain itself in a competitive market.

    Some importance of OB:

    The following basic importance is below;

    • It builds a better relationship by achieving people’s, organizational, and social objectives.
    • It covers a wide array of human resources like behavior, training and development, change management, leadership, teams, etc.
    • They bring coordination which is the essence of management.
    • It improves the goodwill of the organization.
    • It helps to achieve objectives quickly.
    • They make optimum utilization of resources.
    • It facilitates motivation.
    • It leads to higher efficiency.
    • They improve relations in the organization.
    • It is multidisciplinary, in the sense that it applies different techniques, methods, and theories to evaluate the performances.

    Theoretically, it is difficult for us to draw a line between management and organizational behavior. It can say that one supplements the other. Some organizational behavior issues have their roots in management processes. The study of management began much before the study of organiza­tional behavior. Studies in organizational behavior started in the middle of the twentieth century.

    Organizational behavior studies, therefore, draw from management theories to understand aspects such as organizational structure, the behavior of people in an organization, and the issues concerning external and internal fit. Successful management of organizational behavior largely depends on the management practices that prevail in an organization. Understanding organizational behavior, therefore, requires a clear understanding of the basics of management.

  • Group Technology: Meaning, Definition, Advantages, and Limitations

    Group Technology: Meaning, Definition, Advantages, and Limitations

    What does mean Group Technology? Group technology or GT takes advantage of the similarities of parts and machines in a manufacturing system. In this paper, the classification and clustering approaches to group technology in manufacturing systems are discussed. The mathematical programming formulations for the clustering problem are presented. GT is the important technology among the others and it will play a major role in the factory of the future. So, what is the topic we are going to discuss; Group Technology: Meaning, Definition, Advantages, and Limitations.

    Here are explained; What is the Group Technology? first Meaning, Definition, Advantages, and finally Limitations.

    Meaning of Group technology: GT is a concept that is currently attracting a lot of attention from the manufacturing community. GT offers a number of ways to improve productivity in batch manufacturing. The essence of GT is to capitalize on similarities in recurring tasks. GT is, very simply, a philosophy to exploit similarities and achieve efficiencies grouping like problems.

    Group technology is an approach to organizing manufacture which can be applied in any industry (machining, welding, foundry, press work, forging, plastic molding, etc.) where small-batch variety production is used.

    Discuss of GT list;

    • What is the Group Technology?
    • Meaning of Group Technology.
    • Definition of Group Technology.
    • Advantages of Group Technology, and.
    • Limitations of Group Technology.

    Definition of Group technology:

    The basic approach enables all aspects of manufacturing, from design, through estimating and planning, to production, to be rationalized. It forms the basis for the development of computer-aided procedures and flexible automation. Group technology is a manufacturing philosophy or principle whose basic concept is to identify and bring together related or similar parts and processes, to take advantage of the similarities which exist, during all stages of design and manufacture.

    If parts can be classified into families, and machines arranged into groups, then the handling of parts during manufacture can be easily done by the robot. It must be understood that there exists a relationship between finished products and the parts from which they are made. While assemblies may bear little relation to each other, the sub-assemblies from which they are constructed will exhibit some like features. By exploiting the similarities which exist among such a population of parts, group technology sets out to reduce the time and cost of manufacture.

    “Group technology is the realization that many problems are similar and that, by grouping similar problems, a single solution can be found to a set of problems, thus saving time and effort.”

    Explain the Definition;

    The main theme is thus to identify somehow from the large variety of parts those families which require similar manufacturing operations. Cells are created to manufacture defined types and size ranges of parts. Groups of machines, chosen for each family are situated together in a group layout, in such a way that parts flow from one machine to the next in the sequence of operation.

    It is not necessary for every part to visit each machine, but the machines in a cell should ideally be capable of carrying out all the operations required in the family. It may be remembered that in a functional layout, all like machines are grouped at one place and thus a product has to move a lot of distance in a zig-zag manner. But in a cell layout, various machines are arranged so that product flows from one machine to the next in sequence.

    History of Group Technology:

    Prior to 1913, the era of Henry Ford and his Model T, all machining models were similar to our present job shop techniques with machines laid out usually in lines or blocks of similar machines. The work was loaded onto the machines usually by the manual progress control system. Ford introduced the assembly line and that, in turn, led to automated transfer machines. However, the majority of engineering do not produce items in the quantity that justify such methods and so the jobbing shop philosophy continued.

    GT is mainly coordination of normal good engineering practices. It is impossible to say who first practiced GT. There are reports of it having been used in Germany in the 1930s. In an international Conference held in Stockholm in 1947, the basic groups were explained by C.B.Nanthorst. In Italy, M. Patrignany was an early exponent of this technology. However, little of this appears to have been in English. First published work was from the USSR by S.P.Mitrofanov in 1959 and thereafter subsequent books here published by F.S.Denyanyuk and E.K. Ivanov.

    The first reported work on GT outside Russia was done by a French Forges et Ateliers de Construction Electriques de Jeurmont – and this was about in Machinery in 1962. Subsequently, several British companies conducted considerable work in this field. There have also been considerable studies done by various consultants in the Universities. The significant contribution by J.L.Burbidge in the 1960s led to GT as A total Manufacturing Philosophy.

    Advantages of Group Technology:

    According to Burbidge, the following are the advantages of introducing GT in manufacturing.

    • Short throughput times because machines are closed together.
    • Better quality because groups complete parts and the machines are closed together under one foreman.
    • Lower material handling costs because machines are closed together under one foreman.
    • Better accountability because of machines complete parts. The foreman can be made responsible for costs, quality, and completion by the due date.
    • Training for promotion since GT provides a line of succession because a group is a mini-department.
    • Automation GT is the first evolutionary step in automation.
    • Reduced set up time since similar parts brought together on the same.
    • Morale and job satisfaction since most workers prefer to work in groups.
    • The output is improved due to improved resource utili­sation.
    • Work in progress and finished stock levels are re­duced.
    • Simplified estimating, accounting and work man­agement.
    • Improved plant replacement decisions, and.
    • Improved job satisfaction, morale, and communica­tion.

    Studies were undertaken by N.L.Hyer indicates the following significant savings after implementing GT Snead prepared a summary matrix, listing the benefits listing benefits achieved for the various GT. What is the Definition of Production Management?

    Group Technology Meaning Definition Advantages and Limitations
    Group Technology: Meaning, Definition, Advantages, and Limitations. #Pixabay.

    Limitations of Group Technology:

    Group Technology is a great concept. But all good concepts do have their own limitations and need proper care in their applications for results to be realized in practice.

    The Disadvantages of Group Technology or cellular manufacturing may be as follows.

    • High Cost: The cost of implementation is generally high. This is because an outside consultant is often required since in-house expertise on GT is rarely available. It requires a long set up time and painful debugging.
    • Not Suitable for large Variety of Products: May not be suitable for a factory with a very large variety of products.
    • The entire production of the company cannot be put under the GT and hence GT will have to coexist with the conventional layouts.
    • Not suits all Applications: There are too many GT codes in used and there is no one GT code that suits all applications.
    • It is often difficult to conceive all the operations for a group of components being taken care of in the cell created for it.
    • The range of product mix in a plant may be under constant change in which case the GT cells may need a constant revision which is impractical.
    • The additional cost of implementation of this system.
    • The rate of change in product range and mix.
    • Difficulties with out-of-cell operations, and.
    • Coexistence with non-cellular systems.

    How to Uses of Group Technology in the Company for Production?

    Survey of product and use of group technology:

    Group technology technique can be conveniently followed using a classification system. In an assembly, a variety of parts exist. These varieties of parts can be-segregated in three broad areas, viz.

    • Standard and proprietary parts (like nuts, bolts, screws, keys, washers, etc.)
    • Similar parts (like shafts, gears, bearings, levers, etc.)
    • Product specific parts (like gearbox, bed, saddle, etc.)

    It may be noted that the group technology is not concerned with categories (i) and (iii) but relates to category (ii). The aim thus is to group the range of parts under the category (ii) in some way, for the purpose of manufacture. Several types of classification systems have been devised and one has to carefully consider the system based on his needs.

    An organization with a wide range of products needs a complex detailed system but the same is not good for the one dealing with a limited range. Provision should always be made for future likely growth and classification system chose must keep this requirement in view.

    Organizational suitability for Group Technology:

    The suitability of a firm for the introduction of GT depends on several factors. The survey of Willey and Dale give a tentative description of a company profile likely to achieve. The greatest benefits from GT, some of these are:

    • The company must be a relatively small organization with reasonably small machine tools, and manufacturing equipment.
    • The company should not be typified by either large or small component variety.
    • The batch sizes and the batch size range of products of the companies it is relatively small.

    Athersmith and Crookall Rajagopal and Smith Gupta Andand Grayson have suggested. Another way of finding out the suitability of GT for a batch production industry. Computer simulation has been used by the effect of the introduction of GT in the batch production. Industries based on the parameters such as throughput time. WIP inventory and plant utilization Further GT are considered a desirable stepping stone for establishing Just-In-Time production.

  • Explain the Organizational set up of Merchant Bankers in India!

    In India a common Organizational set up of merchant bankers to operate is in the form of divisions of Indian and Foreign banks and Financial institutions, subsidiary companies established by bankers like SBI, Canada Bank, Punjab National Bank, Bank of India, etc. some firms are also organized by financial and technical consultants and professionals. Securities and Exchanges Board of India (SEBI) has divided the merchant bankers into four categories based on their capital adequacy. Each category is authorized to perform certain functions. Also learned, Creative Accounting, Explain the Organizational set up of Merchant Bankers in India!

    Learn, here are, Explain the Organizational set up of Merchant Bankers in India!

    Defines merchant banker as:

    “Any person who is engaged in the business of issue management either by making arrangements regarding selling, buying or subscribing to securities as manager-consultant, adviser or rendering corporate advisory services in relation to such issue management.” 

    From the point of Organizational setup, India’s merchant banking organizations can be categorized into 4 groups on the basis of their linkage with parent activity.

    They are:

    1. Institutional Base:

    Where merchant banks function as an independent wing or as the subsidiary of various Private/ Central Governments/State Governments Financial institutions. Most of the financial institutions in India are in the public sector and therefore such set up plays a role on the lines of governmental priorities and policies.

    2. Banker Base:

    These merchant bankers function as a division/ subsidiary of the banking organization. The parent banks are either nationalized commercial banks or the foreign banks operating in India. These organizations have brought professionalism in the Merchant Banking sector and they help their parent organization to make a presence in the capital market.

    3. Broker Base:

    In the recent past, there has been an inflow of Qualified and professionally skilled brokers in various Stock Exchanges of India. These brokers undertake Merchant Banking related operating also like providing investment and portfolio management services.

    4. Private Base:

    These merchant banking firms are originated in private sectors. These organizations are the outcome of opportunities and scope in the merchant banking business and they are providing skill oriented specialized services to their clients. Some foreign merchant bankers are also entering either independently or through some collaboration with their Indian counterparts.

    Private Sectors merchant banking firms have come up either as the sole proprietorship, partnership, private limited or public limited companies. Many of these firms were in existence for quite some time before they added a new activity in the form of merchant banking services by opening new division on the lines of commercial banks and All India Financial Institution (AIFI).

  • What is the Scope of Industrial Relations?

    What is the Scope of Industrial Relations?

    The concept of industrial relations is explaining their scope and IR has a very wide meaning and connotation. In the narrow sense, it means that the employer, employee relationship confines itself to the relationship that emerges out of the day to day association of the management and the labor. In its wider sense, industrial relations include the relationship between an employee and an employer in the course of the running of an industry and may project it to spheres, which may transgress to the areas of quality control, marketing, price fixation and disposition of profits among others. Also, learn the Importance of Industrial Relations.

    Learn and Study, What is the Scope of Industrial Relations?

    The term industrial relations has a broad as well as a narrow outlook. Originally, industrial relations broadly define to include the relationships and interactions between employers and employees. From this perspective, industrial relations covers all aspects of the employment relationship, including human resource management, employee relations, and union-management (or labor) relations. Now its meaning has become more specific and restricted.

    Accordingly, industrial relations pertains to the study and practice of collective bargaining, trade unionism, and labor-management relations, while human resource management is a separate, largely distinct field that deals with nonunion employment relationships and the personnel practices and policies of employers.

    The scope of industrial relations is quite vast.

    The main issues involved here include the following:

    • Collective bargaining.
    • Machinery for settlement of industrial disputes.
    • Standing orders.
    • Worker’s participation in management, and.
    • Unfair labor practices.

    Definition and Scope of industrial relations:

    The ultimate aim of any human activity at the socio-economic level should be the minimal use of available resources in achieving the maximum economic and social results, i.e. to be increasingly productive. The productivity of capital, machines, and resources other than human resources can be improved in various ways.

    But improving the productivity of human resources is a complex and onerous task, for the simple reason that “labor” stands for both an individual human being and a group of individuals with different perceptions about productivity, motivation and attitudes, and with different needs. In organizations, individuals do not operate in isolation. They interact and react collectively to various issues in which management has an interest, including productivity.

    Thus productivity improvement extends beyond the domain of the management of workers and becomes a labor-management or industrial relations issue to be negotiated, settled and implemented jointly by the management and the union. Productivity improvement as an industrial relations issue thus acquires a greater significance in all enterprises where the employees are organized.

    “Industrial relations” broadly means the relations arising out of employment. In this broad sense, it covers the area of personnel management or human resources management and labor-management relations or labor relations. In its narrower sense, it refers only to the relations between management and the unions. And in its popular usage, it refers only to labor-management relations.

    More things…

    Industrial relations in organizations is the total of the management’s attitude to labor and of labor’s attitude to management’s policies and practices that affect the interests of the employees. Industrial relations are, basically, interactions between management and union(s). They involve continuous dialogue between the two sides on various issues of common interest; through such dialogues, the two sides shape each other’s attitudes.

    The approach, methods, strategies, and techniques, etc., of management in achieving the desired objectives vary from one organization to another. This is especially true about productivity improvement through industrial relations. It is, therefore, primarily the responsibility of management to develop industrial relations with workers and the unions to promote productivity continuingly.

    Another scope of Industrial Relations:

    Based on the above definitions, the scope of Industrial Relations can easily be delineated as follows:

    1. Labor relations, i.e., relations between labor union and management.
    2. Employer-employee relations i.e. relations between management and employees.
    3. The role of various parties’ viz., employers, employees, and state in maintaining industrial relations.
    4. The mechanism of handling conflicts between employers and employees, in case of conflicts, arise.

    The main aspects of industrial relations can be identified as follows:

    1. Promotion and development of healthy labor-management relations.
    2. Maintenance of industrial peace and avoidance of industrial strife.
    3. Development and growth of industrial democracy.

    What is the Scope of Industrial Relations - ilearnlot
    Scope of Industrial Relations, Image from Online.

  • What is the Importance of Industrial Relations?

    What is the Importance of Industrial Relations?

    Industrial relations refers to processes and outcomes involving employment relationships. Importance of Industrial Relations for Employees and Employers. Frequently the term used in a narrower sense, for employment relationships involving the collective representation of employees in the form of a labor union or employee association, especially in the United States.

    Learn and Study, What is the Importance of Industrial Relations?

    At the other extreme, industrial relations has been defined by Thomas A. Kochan, in his book Collective Bargaining and Industrial Relations, as “all aspects of people at work,” but there are some aspects of people at work that entail highly technical subjects (e.g., industrial hygiene, ergonomics) which are not normally regarded as falling within the mainstream of industrial relations study. Also, learn the Importance of Employee Relations.

    4 Importance of Industrial Relations:

    The following industrial relations 4 importance below are;

    • Increased Productivity: With amicable industrial relations both the workers and managers continue to work on their respective position and contribute towards the overall productivity of the firm. Thus, IR ensures the continuity of production.
    • Reduced Industrial Disputes: An effective IR helps in the reduction of industrial disputes as both the management and the workers maintain harmonious relations with each other and work in unison towards the accomplishment of production objectives.
    • Increased Morale: The peaceful industrial relations boost the moral level of the employees as they feel that their interest coincides with that of the employer’s, and their efforts will result in the overall profitability of the firm.
    • Minimization of Wastage: A good IR ensures reduced wastage as the resources – Man, Machinery, Material are fully utilized and are effectively contributing towards the overall productivity of the firm.
    More importance;

    The significance of good industrial relations in any country cannot ones emphasize. Good industrial relations are necessary for the following reasons.

    1. To help in the economic progress of a country. The problem of an increase in productivity is essentially the problem of maintaining good industrial relations. That is why they form an important part of the economic development plan of every civilized nation.
    2. To help in to establish and to maintain true industrial democracy this is a prerequisite for the establishment of a socialist society.
    3. They help the management both in the formulations of informed labor relations policies and in their translation into action.
    4. To encourage collective bargaining as a means of self-regulation. They consider the negotiation process as an educational opportunity a chance both to learn and to reach.
    5. To help the government making laws forbidding unfair practices of unions and employers. In climate good industrial relations every party works for the solidarity of worker’s movement. Unions gain more strength and vitality. There is no inter-union rivalry.
    6. Employees give unions their rightful recognition and encourage them to participate in all decisions. Unions divert their activities from fighting and belligerence to increase the size of the distribution and to make their members more informed (workers education) on vital issues concerning them.
    7. To boost the discipline and morale of workers. Maintenance of discipline ensures orderliness. Effectiveness and economy in the use of resources. On the other hand, lack of discipline means waste, loss, and confusion. It also means insubordination and non-co-operation.
    8. Industrial relations are eventually human relations, therefore, the same basis of human psychology prevails in the field of industrial relations, and the efficiency of an industry is directly related to the quality of the relationship, which is being built up amongst the individuals who work together.

    Importance of Industrial Relations for Employees and Employers:

    Industrial relations usually imply good and positive relations between employees and employers. The good Industrial Relations help run an industry effectively and successfully, i.e., the desideratum of the day. Top 5 importance of Industrial Relations can imbue with the multiplicity of justifications.

    To mention, good Industrial Relations help:

    Foster Industrial Peace:

    Under the mechanism of Industrial Relations, both employees and managers discuss the matter and consult each other before initiating any actions. Doubts, if any, in the minds of either party are removed. Thus, unilateral actions that prop confusion and misunderstanding disappear from the scene. In this way, Industrial Relations helps create a peaceful environment in the organization. Peace, in turn, breeds prosperity.

    Promote Industrial Democracy:

    Industrial democracy means the government-mandated worker participation at various levels of the organization about decisions that affect workers. It is mainly the joint consultations, that pave the way for industrial democracy and cement relationships between workers and management. This benefits them both. The motivated workers give their best and maximum to the organization, on the one hand, and share their share of the fruits of organizational progress jointly with management, on the other.

    The benefit to Workers:

    Industrial Relations benefits workers in several ways. For example, it protects workers against unethical practices on the part of management to exploit workers by putting them under inhuman working conditions and niggardly wages. It also provides a procedure to resolve workers’ grievances relating to work.

    The benefit to Management:

    Industrial Relations protects the rights of managers too. As and when workers create the problem of indiscipline, Industrial Relations provides managers with a system to handle employee indiscipline in the organization.

    Improve Productivity:

    Experiences indicate that good industrial relations serve as the key to increased productivity in industrial organizations. Eicher Tractors, Alwar represents one such case. In this plant, productivity went up from 32 percent to 38 percent between 1994 and 1997. This increase attribute to the peaceful IR in the plant.

    Similar other success stories abound in the country. As reported by V.S.P. Rao, Sundaram Fasteners (A TVS group company which begged the prestigious GM award for the fourth successive year in 1999 as a quality supplier of radiator caps) well knows for zero breakdowns, zero accidents, and zero defects. The company did not lose even a single day due to strike. The per-employee productivity is comparable to the best in the world. One study rates the company among the 20 most competitive companies in Asia.

    What is the Importance of Industrial Relations - ilearnlot
    Importance of Industrial Relations for Employees, Image from Online.